Difference between revisions of "Stivers2005a"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Social Science & Medicine | |Journal=Social Science & Medicine | ||
|Volume=60 | |Volume=60 | ||
| + | |Number=5 | ||
|Pages=949–964 | |Pages=949–964 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953604003260 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.040 | |DOI=10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.040 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This study draws on a database of 570 community-based acute pediatric encounters in the USA and uses conversation analysis as a methodology to identify two formats physicians use to recommend non-antibiotic treatment in acute pediatric care (using a subset of 309 cases): recommendations for particular treatment (e.g., | + | |Abstract=This study draws on a database of 570 community-based acute pediatric encounters in the USA and uses conversation analysis as a methodology to identify two formats physicians use to recommend non-antibiotic treatment in acute pediatric care (using a subset of 309 cases): recommendations for particular treatment (e.g., “I’m gonna give her some cough medicine.”) and recommendations against particular treatment (e.g., “She doesn’t need any antibiotics.”). The findings are that the presentation of a specific affirmative recommendation for treatment is less likely to engender parent resistance to a non-antibiotic treatment recommendation than a recommendation against particular treatment even if the physician later offers a recommendation for particular treatment. It is suggested that physicians who provide a specific positive treatment recommendation followed by a negative recommendation are most likely to attain parent alignment and acceptance when recommending a non-antibiotic treatment for a viral upper respiratory illness. |
| − | The | ||
| − | alignment and acceptance when recommending a non-antibiotic treatment for a viral upper respiratory illness. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:37, 3 November 2019
| Stivers2005a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stivers2005a |
| Author(s) | Tanya Stivers |
| Title | Non-antibiotic treatment recommendations: delivery formats and implications for parent resistance |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation analysis, Doctor–patient communication, Antibiotic prescribing, Pediatric care, USA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2005 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Science & Medicine |
| Volume | 60 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 949–964 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.040 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study draws on a database of 570 community-based acute pediatric encounters in the USA and uses conversation analysis as a methodology to identify two formats physicians use to recommend non-antibiotic treatment in acute pediatric care (using a subset of 309 cases): recommendations for particular treatment (e.g., “I’m gonna give her some cough medicine.”) and recommendations against particular treatment (e.g., “She doesn’t need any antibiotics.”). The findings are that the presentation of a specific affirmative recommendation for treatment is less likely to engender parent resistance to a non-antibiotic treatment recommendation than a recommendation against particular treatment even if the physician later offers a recommendation for particular treatment. It is suggested that physicians who provide a specific positive treatment recommendation followed by a negative recommendation are most likely to attain parent alignment and acceptance when recommending a non-antibiotic treatment for a viral upper respiratory illness.
Notes
