Difference between revisions of "Schegloff1997b"
(BibTeX auto import 2014-09-30 09:07:35) |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Emanuel A Schegloff; | ||
| + | |Title=Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA ; Repair; Other-initiated repair; | ||
|Key=Schegloff1997b | |Key=Schegloff1997b | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=1997 | |Year=1997 | ||
|Month=jan | |Month=jan | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01638539709545001 | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01638539709545001 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/01638539709545001 | |DOI=10.1080/01638539709545001 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Working within a naturalistic paradigm for which the notion of "practices" is more apt | ||
| + | than "processes," I address the multiplicity of ties between practices of talk-in-interac- | ||
| + | tion and the actions which they accomplish. After describing common procedures of | ||
| + | data collection and preparation in this mode of inquiry and the "boundary cases" | ||
| + | which these procedures may engender, I explore alternative actions which can be rec- | ||
| + | ognizably produced by practices of talking ordinarily associated with the action of | ||
| + | "initiating repair." Two practices in particular are examined: questioning terms | ||
| + | ("huh?," "who?," etc.) and certain forms of repeats. As well, I show that in some con- | ||
| + | texts the action of initiating repair can be produced by a practice which does not ordi- | ||
| + | narily produce it. The moral of the article is that situated analysis must go hand-in- | ||
| + | hand with more formal analysis in order to arrive at satisfactory accounts of discourse | ||
| + | practices, and of discourse processes as well. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:46, 6 August 2016
| Schegloff1997b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Schegloff1997b |
| Author(s) | Emanuel A Schegloff |
| Title | Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Repair, Other-initiated repair |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1997 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | jan |
| Journal | Discourse Processes |
| Volume | 23 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 499–545 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/01638539709545001 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Working within a naturalistic paradigm for which the notion of "practices" is more apt than "processes," I address the multiplicity of ties between practices of talk-in-interac- tion and the actions which they accomplish. After describing common procedures of data collection and preparation in this mode of inquiry and the "boundary cases" which these procedures may engender, I explore alternative actions which can be rec- ognizably produced by practices of talking ordinarily associated with the action of "initiating repair." Two practices in particular are examined: questioning terms ("huh?," "who?," etc.) and certain forms of repeats. As well, I show that in some con- texts the action of initiating repair can be produced by a practice which does not ordi- narily produce it. The moral of the article is that situated analysis must go hand-in- hand with more formal analysis in order to arrive at satisfactory accounts of discourse practices, and of discourse processes as well.
Notes
