Difference between revisions of "Takahashi2018"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Junko Takahashi |Title=Practices of self-selection in the graduate classroom: Extension, redirection, and disjunction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Junko Takahashi | |Author(s)=Junko Takahashi | ||
|Title=Practices of self-selection in the graduate classroom: Extension, redirection, and disjunction | |Title=Practices of self-selection in the graduate classroom: Extension, redirection, and disjunction | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn-taking; Classroom interactions; Graduate; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn-taking; Classroom interactions; Graduate; |
|Key=Takahashi2018 | |Key=Takahashi2018 | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Linguistics and Education | |Journal=Linguistics and Education | ||
|Volume=46 | |Volume=46 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=70–81 |
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589817303030 | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589817303030 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.linged.2018.06.002 |
|Abstract=This study investigates the practices of student self-selection in the graduate-level American classroom. Self-selection is a crucial part of the learning process because it allows for the exchange of students’ and teachers’ views, analyses, and opinions, making these exchanges into a whole-classroom experience. Active students who make oral contributions in class are believed to learn more than those who do not (Weaver & Qi, 2005) and to enhance their critical thinking (Crone, 1997; Garside, 1996). In the graduate classroom, however, student self-selection may be challenging, as the material students tackle tends to be highly technical. Given the importance of student self-selection in this academically demanding context, more analytical attention must be devoted to uncovering the nature of participation. With 20 h of video data collected from graduate classes and analyzed through the lens of conversation analysis (CA), this study identifies three main practices employed by self-selecting speakers: extension by piling, contribution with hand-raising, and participation prefacing. Each occurs with different degrees of ‘fittedness’ to prior talk, in part evidenced in the different levels of mitigation use by the self-selectors. The findings of this study contribute to the small body of classroom discourse studies in the graduate classroom and provide a first step towards understanding how self-selections may be strategically managed or promoted. | |Abstract=This study investigates the practices of student self-selection in the graduate-level American classroom. Self-selection is a crucial part of the learning process because it allows for the exchange of students’ and teachers’ views, analyses, and opinions, making these exchanges into a whole-classroom experience. Active students who make oral contributions in class are believed to learn more than those who do not (Weaver & Qi, 2005) and to enhance their critical thinking (Crone, 1997; Garside, 1996). In the graduate classroom, however, student self-selection may be challenging, as the material students tackle tends to be highly technical. Given the importance of student self-selection in this academically demanding context, more analytical attention must be devoted to uncovering the nature of participation. With 20 h of video data collected from graduate classes and analyzed through the lens of conversation analysis (CA), this study identifies three main practices employed by self-selecting speakers: extension by piling, contribution with hand-raising, and participation prefacing. Each occurs with different degrees of ‘fittedness’ to prior talk, in part evidenced in the different levels of mitigation use by the self-selectors. The findings of this study contribute to the small body of classroom discourse studies in the graduate classroom and provide a first step towards understanding how self-selections may be strategically managed or promoted. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:30, 11 January 2020
| Takahashi2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Takahashi2018 |
| Author(s) | Junko Takahashi |
| Title | Practices of self-selection in the graduate classroom: Extension, redirection, and disjunction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Turn-taking, Classroom interactions, Graduate |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Linguistics and Education |
| Volume | 46 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 70–81 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.linged.2018.06.002 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study investigates the practices of student self-selection in the graduate-level American classroom. Self-selection is a crucial part of the learning process because it allows for the exchange of students’ and teachers’ views, analyses, and opinions, making these exchanges into a whole-classroom experience. Active students who make oral contributions in class are believed to learn more than those who do not (Weaver & Qi, 2005) and to enhance their critical thinking (Crone, 1997; Garside, 1996). In the graduate classroom, however, student self-selection may be challenging, as the material students tackle tends to be highly technical. Given the importance of student self-selection in this academically demanding context, more analytical attention must be devoted to uncovering the nature of participation. With 20 h of video data collected from graduate classes and analyzed through the lens of conversation analysis (CA), this study identifies three main practices employed by self-selecting speakers: extension by piling, contribution with hand-raising, and participation prefacing. Each occurs with different degrees of ‘fittedness’ to prior talk, in part evidenced in the different levels of mitigation use by the self-selectors. The findings of this study contribute to the small body of classroom discourse studies in the graduate classroom and provide a first step towards understanding how self-selections may be strategically managed or promoted.
Notes
