Difference between revisions of "Jackson2013"
EdwardHolmes (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Clare Jackson; |Title=‘Why do these people’s opinions matter?’ Positioning known referents as unnameable others |Tag(s)=CA; Perso...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Clare Jackson; | + | |Author(s)=Clare Jackson; |
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=“Why do these people’s opinions matter?”: positioning known referents as unnameable others |
|Tag(s)=CA; Person Reference; Social distance; Complaints; Membership categories | |Tag(s)=CA; Person Reference; Social distance; Complaints; Membership categories | ||
|Key=Jackson2013 | |Key=Jackson2013 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=15 | |Volume=15 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=299–317 |
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461445613480587 | |URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461445613480587 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1177/1461445613480587 |
|Abstract=The way we refer to third parties in talk is one means through which relationships between speaker, recipients and referents are made relevant. A range of referring expressions is available and any number of expressions might correctly refer to a referent. One guide to selection is the preference for achieving recognition and the default practice is, where possible, to use a name. This conversation analytic article describes a practice that does not fit the default pattern. In this practice, speakers select a broad social category (typically gendered, e.g. guy, woman, but not always, e.g. people) when a recognitional form could (and perhaps, ought to) have been used. Despite the designed selection of a categorical form, the referent(s) remains recognitional. For example, in one extract, a mother in conversation with her teenage daughter refers to a collective made up of her former husband and his girlfriend as ‘these people’. The daughter has no difficulty working out who ‘these people’ are and recognizes it as a reference to her father and stepmother. I show that this designedly categorical formulation often contributes to hostile action by distancing the referent(s) from parties to the interaction – making the referent(s) unnameable and not connected to the speaker and recipient. The role of demonstrative pronouns – this, that, these – are discussed in relation to constructing social distance between speakers, recipients and referents. | |Abstract=The way we refer to third parties in talk is one means through which relationships between speaker, recipients and referents are made relevant. A range of referring expressions is available and any number of expressions might correctly refer to a referent. One guide to selection is the preference for achieving recognition and the default practice is, where possible, to use a name. This conversation analytic article describes a practice that does not fit the default pattern. In this practice, speakers select a broad social category (typically gendered, e.g. guy, woman, but not always, e.g. people) when a recognitional form could (and perhaps, ought to) have been used. Despite the designed selection of a categorical form, the referent(s) remains recognitional. For example, in one extract, a mother in conversation with her teenage daughter refers to a collective made up of her former husband and his girlfriend as ‘these people’. The daughter has no difficulty working out who ‘these people’ are and recognizes it as a reference to her father and stepmother. I show that this designedly categorical formulation often contributes to hostile action by distancing the referent(s) from parties to the interaction – making the referent(s) unnameable and not connected to the speaker and recipient. The role of demonstrative pronouns – this, that, these – are discussed in relation to constructing social distance between speakers, recipients and referents. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:45, 1 December 2019
| Jackson2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Jackson2013 |
| Author(s) | Clare Jackson |
| Title | “Why do these people’s opinions matter?”: positioning known referents as unnameable others |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | CA, Person Reference, Social distance, Complaints, Membership categories |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | June |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 15 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 299–317 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445613480587 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The way we refer to third parties in talk is one means through which relationships between speaker, recipients and referents are made relevant. A range of referring expressions is available and any number of expressions might correctly refer to a referent. One guide to selection is the preference for achieving recognition and the default practice is, where possible, to use a name. This conversation analytic article describes a practice that does not fit the default pattern. In this practice, speakers select a broad social category (typically gendered, e.g. guy, woman, but not always, e.g. people) when a recognitional form could (and perhaps, ought to) have been used. Despite the designed selection of a categorical form, the referent(s) remains recognitional. For example, in one extract, a mother in conversation with her teenage daughter refers to a collective made up of her former husband and his girlfriend as ‘these people’. The daughter has no difficulty working out who ‘these people’ are and recognizes it as a reference to her father and stepmother. I show that this designedly categorical formulation often contributes to hostile action by distancing the referent(s) from parties to the interaction – making the referent(s) unnameable and not connected to the speaker and recipient. The role of demonstrative pronouns – this, that, these – are discussed in relation to constructing social distance between speakers, recipients and referents.
Notes
