Difference between revisions of "Kitzinger2007e"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Celia Kitzinger; Rose Rickford |Title=Becoming a "bloke": The construction of gender in interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Celia Kitzinger; Rose Rickford | |Author(s)=Celia Kitzinger; Rose Rickford | ||
| − | |Title=Becoming a | + | |Title=Becoming a “bloke”: the construction of gender in interaction |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Membership Categorization; Person Reference; Gender; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Membership Categorization; Person Reference; Gender; |
|Key=Kitzinger2007e | |Key=Kitzinger2007e | ||
|Year=2007 | |Year=2007 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=17 | |Volume=17 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=214–223 |
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959353507076554 | |URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959353507076554 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This article uses conversation analysis (CA) on a single case study (a call to a helpline for women with symphysis pubis dysfunction) to explore how, and why, a speaker produces a non-present third person she has earlier referred to using a non-gendered term ( | + | |DOI=10.1177/0959353507076554 |
| + | |Abstract=This article uses conversation analysis (CA) on a single case study (a call to a helpline for women with symphysis pubis dysfunction) to explore how, and why, a speaker produces a non-present third person she has earlier referred to using a non-gendered term ('your partner') as a member of a gendered category ('a bloke') — and why she later seeks to undo this categorization. This contributes to (feminist) CA an understanding of how gender is constructed in talk-in-interaction and, more generally, to understandings of membership categorization and person reference. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:52, 18 November 2019
| Kitzinger2007e | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kitzinger2007e |
| Author(s) | Celia Kitzinger, Rose Rickford |
| Title | Becoming a “bloke”: the construction of gender in interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Membership Categorization, Person Reference, Gender |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Feminism & Psychology |
| Volume | 17 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 214–223 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0959353507076554 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article uses conversation analysis (CA) on a single case study (a call to a helpline for women with symphysis pubis dysfunction) to explore how, and why, a speaker produces a non-present third person she has earlier referred to using a non-gendered term ('your partner') as a member of a gendered category ('a bloke') — and why she later seeks to undo this categorization. This contributes to (feminist) CA an understanding of how gender is constructed in talk-in-interaction and, more generally, to understandings of membership categorization and person reference.
Notes
