Difference between revisions of "Hutchby2001d"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; |Title=Technologies, texts and affordances |Tag(s)=EMCA; Technology; Affordances; Materiality; Realism; Social constructio...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; | + | |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; |
|Title=Technologies, texts and affordances | |Title=Technologies, texts and affordances | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Technology; Affordances; Materiality; Realism; Social constructionism; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Technology; Affordances; Materiality; Realism; Social constructionism; |
|Key=Hutchby2001d | |Key=Hutchby2001d | ||
|Year=2001 | |Year=2001 | ||
|Journal=Sociology | |Journal=Sociology | ||
|Volume=35 | |Volume=35 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=441–456 |
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/s0038038501000219 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/S0038038501000219 | |DOI=10.1177/S0038038501000219 | ||
|Abstract=In contrast to recent sociological emphases on the social shaping of technology, this article proposes and illustrates a way of analysing the technological shaping of sociality. Drawing on the concept of affordances (Gibson 1979), the article argues for a recognition of the constraining, as well as enabling, materiality of artefacts. The argument is set in the theoretical context of one of the most recent and comprehensive statements of anti-essentialism (Grint and Woolgar 1997). The position is illustrated through a reinterpretation of some case studies used by proponents of the radical constructivist position. | |Abstract=In contrast to recent sociological emphases on the social shaping of technology, this article proposes and illustrates a way of analysing the technological shaping of sociality. Drawing on the concept of affordances (Gibson 1979), the article argues for a recognition of the constraining, as well as enabling, materiality of artefacts. The argument is set in the theoretical context of one of the most recent and comprehensive statements of anti-essentialism (Grint and Woolgar 1997). The position is illustrated through a reinterpretation of some case studies used by proponents of the radical constructivist position. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:26, 29 October 2019
| Hutchby2001d | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hutchby2001d |
| Author(s) | Ian Hutchby |
| Title | Technologies, texts and affordances |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Technology, Affordances, Materiality, Realism, Social constructionism |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2001 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociology |
| Volume | 35 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 441–456 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/S0038038501000219 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In contrast to recent sociological emphases on the social shaping of technology, this article proposes and illustrates a way of analysing the technological shaping of sociality. Drawing on the concept of affordances (Gibson 1979), the article argues for a recognition of the constraining, as well as enabling, materiality of artefacts. The argument is set in the theoretical context of one of the most recent and comprehensive statements of anti-essentialism (Grint and Woolgar 1997). The position is illustrated through a reinterpretation of some case studies used by proponents of the radical constructivist position.
Notes
