Difference between revisions of "Response Cries"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
From [[Goffman1978]]: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog."
 
From [[Goffman1978]]: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog."
 +
 +
Response cries are not an inherently EM/CA device, and there is a wide literature that takes up Goffman's terms and develops it in related areas of interaction studies e.g.:
 +
 +
* http://ideophone.org/ideophones-are-not-response-cries/
 +
* http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03782166/18/2
 +
 +
However, many EM/CA studies develop Goffman's concept in terms of sequential analysis. Here is a growing bibliography of the papers in the EMCA wiki tagged with the 'response cries' keyword:
  
 
{{#widget:Iframe
 
{{#widget:Iframe
|url=http://emcawiki.net/bibtex/browser.php?keywords=Response+Cries&bib=emca.bib
+
|url=https://emcawiki.net/bibtex/browser.php?keywords=Response+Cries&bib=emca.bib
 
|border=0
 
|border=0
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:15, 21 January 2023

From Goffman1978: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog."

Response cries are not an inherently EM/CA device, and there is a wide literature that takes up Goffman's terms and develops it in related areas of interaction studies e.g.:

However, many EM/CA studies develop Goffman's concept in terms of sequential analysis. Here is a growing bibliography of the papers in the EMCA wiki tagged with the 'response cries' keyword: