Difference between revisions of "Response Cries"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "From Goffman1978: Utterances are housed not in paragraphs, but in turns at talk-occasions implying a temporary taking of the floor, as well as an alternation of takers. Tu...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
From [[Goffman1978]]: Utterances are housed not in paragraphs, but in turns at talk-occasions implying a temporary taking of the floor, as well as an alternation of takers. Turns themselves are naturally coupled into two-party interchanges. Interchanges are linked in runs marked off by some sort of topicality. One or more of these topical runs make up the body of a conversation. This interactionist view assumes that every utterance is a statement establishing the next speaker's words as a reply, or a reply to what the prior speaker has just established, or a mixture of both. Utterances, then, do not stand by themselves-indeed, they often make no sense when so heard-but are constructed and timed to support the close social collaboration of speech turn-taking. In nature the spoken word is only found in verbal interplay, being integrally designed for such collective habitats. However, this paper considers some roguish utterances that appear to violate this interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog. The paper begins with a special class of spoken sentences and ends with a special class of vocalizations-the first failing to qualify as communication, the second failing not to.
+
From [[Goffman1978]]: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog."
 +
 
 +
Response cries are not an inherently EM/CA device, and there is a wide literature that takes up Goffman's terms and develops it in related areas of interaction studies e.g.:
 +
 
 +
* http://ideophone.org/ideophones-are-not-response-cries/
 +
* http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03782166/18/2
 +
 
 +
However, many EM/CA studies develop Goffman's concept in terms of sequential analysis. Here is a growing bibliography of the papers in the EMCA wiki tagged with the 'response cries' keyword:
  
 
{{#widget:Iframe
 
{{#widget:Iframe
|url=http://emcawiki.net/bibtex/browser.php?keywords=Response+Cries&bib=emca.bib
+
|url=https://emcawiki.net/bibtex/browser.php?keywords=Response+Cries&bib=emca.bib
 
|border=0
 
|border=0
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:15, 21 January 2023

From Goffman1978: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog."

Response cries are not an inherently EM/CA device, and there is a wide literature that takes up Goffman's terms and develops it in related areas of interaction studies e.g.:

However, many EM/CA studies develop Goffman's concept in terms of sequential analysis. Here is a growing bibliography of the papers in the EMCA wiki tagged with the 'response cries' keyword: