Difference between revisions of "Kim2013b"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Hye Ri Stephanie Kim; | |Author(s)=Hye Ri Stephanie Kim; | ||
|Title=Reshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning to respond to questions in Korean conversation | |Title=Reshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning to respond to questions in Korean conversation | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; Question and answer; Response design; Kule-nikka; Turn beginning; Discourse markerInteractional Linguistics; Korean; Responding; |
|Key=Kim2013b | |Key=Kim2013b | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
Latest revision as of 09:20, 6 October 2016
| Kim2013b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kim2013b |
| Author(s) | Hye Ri Stephanie Kim |
| Title | Reshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning to respond to questions in Korean conversation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation analysis, Question and answer, Response design, Kule-nikka, Turn beginning, Discourse markerInteractional Linguistics, Korean, Responding |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 57 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 303–317 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.04.006 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Respondents have various ways of resisting the constraints that questions impose on them. In this article I show one way in which Korean speakers deal with trouble of responding to questions as put when beginning to respond: Prefacing their responses with kulenikka. The analysis shows that kulenikka marks the response as departing from the question's terms and signals a reshaping of the response space. Three common contexts for this departure are: Respondents (1) cannot conform to the question's terms due to the question's inadequate presuppositions; (2) defer a straightforward or type-conforming answer; and (3) evade the question. The findings contribute to a developing body of conversation analytic research on how question recipients display resistance to questions, and more generally how turn-beginnings serve as an important place in interaction.
Notes
