Difference between revisions of "Local2012"
(BibTeX auto import 2015-06-30 11:18:38) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=John Local; Gareth Walker; |
|Title=How phonetic features project more talk | |Title=How phonetic features project more talk | ||
| − | + | |Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; EMCA; Phonetics; Projection; | |
| − | |Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics | + | |Key=Local2012 |
| − | | | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
|Journal=Journal of the International Phonetic Association | |Journal=Journal of the International Phonetic Association | ||
|Volume=42 | |Volume=42 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=255–280 |
| + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/how-phonetic-features-project-more-talk/0A9C87ABE7E4B722E6379F74E305C7E5 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1017/S0025100312000187 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Investigations into the management of turn-taking have typically focussed on pitch and other prosodic phenomena, particularly pitch-accents. Here, non-pitch phonetic features and their role in turn-taking are described. Through sustained phonetic and interactional analysis of a naturally occurring, 12-minute long telephone call between two adult speakers of British English, sets of talk-projecting and turn-projecting features are identified. Talk-projecting features include the avoidance of durational lengthening, articulatory anticipation, continuation of voicing, the production of talk in maximally close proximity to a preceding point of possible turn-completion, and the reduction of consonants and vowels. Turn-projecting features include the converse of each of the talk-projecting features, and two other distinct features: release of plosives at the point of possible turn-completion, and the production of audible outbreaths. We show that features of articulatory and phonatory quality and duration are relevant factors in the design and treatment of talk as talk- or turn-projective. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:54, 30 November 2019
| Local2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Local2012 |
| Author(s) | John Local, Gareth Walker |
| Title | How phonetic features project more talk |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Interactional Linguistics, EMCA, Phonetics, Projection |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of the International Phonetic Association |
| Volume | 42 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 255–280 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0025100312000187 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Investigations into the management of turn-taking have typically focussed on pitch and other prosodic phenomena, particularly pitch-accents. Here, non-pitch phonetic features and their role in turn-taking are described. Through sustained phonetic and interactional analysis of a naturally occurring, 12-minute long telephone call between two adult speakers of British English, sets of talk-projecting and turn-projecting features are identified. Talk-projecting features include the avoidance of durational lengthening, articulatory anticipation, continuation of voicing, the production of talk in maximally close proximity to a preceding point of possible turn-completion, and the reduction of consonants and vowels. Turn-projecting features include the converse of each of the talk-projecting features, and two other distinct features: release of plosives at the point of possible turn-completion, and the production of audible outbreaths. We show that features of articulatory and phonatory quality and duration are relevant factors in the design and treatment of talk as talk- or turn-projective.
Notes
