Difference between revisions of "Bartesaghi2009"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Mariaelena Bartesaghi; Sheryl P. Bowen |Title=The acquisition of memory by interview questioning: Holocaust re-membering as category-bou...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Mariaelena Bartesaghi; Sheryl P. Bowen | |Author(s)=Mariaelena Bartesaghi; Sheryl P. Bowen | ||
|Title=The acquisition of memory by interview questioning: Holocaust re-membering as category-bound activity | |Title=The acquisition of memory by interview questioning: Holocaust re-membering as category-bound activity | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Membership Categorization Analysis; Memory; Holocaust; Interviews; Epistemic Rights; Epistemics; Questioning; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Membership Categorization Analysis; Memory; Holocaust; Interviews; Epistemic Rights; Epistemics; Questioning; |
|Key=Bartesaghi2009 | |Key=Bartesaghi2009 | ||
|Year=2009 | |Year=2009 | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=11 | |Volume=11 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=223–243 |
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445608100945 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/1461445608100945 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445608100945 | ||
|Abstract=In this discourse analysis of how memory acquires and is acquired in interview exchanges, we investigate remembering as a category-bound activity, both a tensional and collaborative process of moral ratification of `survivor' as membership category. We propose the term re-membering to mean piecing together possible versions of survivor experiences in talk; these versions, offered by respondents and elicited by interviewers through questioning strategies, are epistemic claims to acquire the Holocaust as memory, or institutional History. We explore the accounting dynamic of interviewer and respondent, the relationship of ownership between survivors and memory, and the duties and moral obligations of the category `Holocaust survivor' that can be shown through the interviews of survivors and their adult daughters. | |Abstract=In this discourse analysis of how memory acquires and is acquired in interview exchanges, we investigate remembering as a category-bound activity, both a tensional and collaborative process of moral ratification of `survivor' as membership category. We propose the term re-membering to mean piecing together possible versions of survivor experiences in talk; these versions, offered by respondents and elicited by interviewers through questioning strategies, are epistemic claims to acquire the Holocaust as memory, or institutional History. We explore the accounting dynamic of interviewer and respondent, the relationship of ownership between survivors and memory, and the duties and moral obligations of the category `Holocaust survivor' that can be shown through the interviews of survivors and their adult daughters. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:08, 23 November 2019
| Bartesaghi2009 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bartesaghi2009 |
| Author(s) | Mariaelena Bartesaghi, Sheryl P. Bowen |
| Title | The acquisition of memory by interview questioning: Holocaust re-membering as category-bound activity |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Membership Categorization Analysis, Memory, Holocaust, Interviews, Epistemic Rights, Epistemics, Questioning |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2009 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 11 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 223–243 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445608100945 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this discourse analysis of how memory acquires and is acquired in interview exchanges, we investigate remembering as a category-bound activity, both a tensional and collaborative process of moral ratification of `survivor' as membership category. We propose the term re-membering to mean piecing together possible versions of survivor experiences in talk; these versions, offered by respondents and elicited by interviewers through questioning strategies, are epistemic claims to acquire the Holocaust as memory, or institutional History. We explore the accounting dynamic of interviewer and respondent, the relationship of ownership between survivors and memory, and the duties and moral obligations of the category `Holocaust survivor' that can be shown through the interviews of survivors and their adult daughters.
Notes
