Difference between revisions of "Lindholm2015"
(BibTeX auto import 2015-05-12 02:15:02) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Camilla Lindholm; | ||
| + | |Title=Parallel realities: the interactional management of confabulation in dementia care encounters | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Confabulation; Dementia; Swedish; | ||
|Key=Lindholm2015 | |Key=Lindholm2015 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | ||
|Volume=48 | |Volume=48 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=176–199 | |Pages=176–199 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025502 |
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2015.1025502 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2015.1025502 | ||
|Abstract=Persons with dementia sometimes confabulate (that is, utter statements unaware of their falsity). This threatens the shared world that is normally presumed as the basis for communication. Coparticipants then have to choose between acquiescing in the confabulation, being noncommittal, or indeed correcting the speaker. In this conversation analytical case study of one individual with vascular dementia, I investigate how health-care personnel and volunteers deal with the problem. The data were extracted from a 30-hour video corpus of interactions between one confabulating person and, in total, eight other elderly individuals, three professional caregivers, and a volunteer at a Swedish-speaking day care center for the elderly in Finland. We see how care providers react to confabulations with a range of response practices along the continuum of acquiescence and noncommitment (but not into the more challenging area of correction). Data are in Finland-Swedish with English translation. | |Abstract=Persons with dementia sometimes confabulate (that is, utter statements unaware of their falsity). This threatens the shared world that is normally presumed as the basis for communication. Coparticipants then have to choose between acquiescing in the confabulation, being noncommittal, or indeed correcting the speaker. In this conversation analytical case study of one individual with vascular dementia, I investigate how health-care personnel and volunteers deal with the problem. The data were extracted from a 30-hour video corpus of interactions between one confabulating person and, in total, eight other elderly individuals, three professional caregivers, and a volunteer at a Swedish-speaking day care center for the elderly in Finland. We see how care providers react to confabulations with a range of response practices along the continuum of acquiescence and noncommitment (but not into the more challenging area of correction). Data are in Finland-Swedish with English translation. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:08, 15 December 2019
| Lindholm2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Lindholm2015 |
| Author(s) | Camilla Lindholm |
| Title | Parallel realities: the interactional management of confabulation in dementia care encounters |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Confabulation, Dementia, Swedish |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 48 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 176–199 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2015.1025502 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Persons with dementia sometimes confabulate (that is, utter statements unaware of their falsity). This threatens the shared world that is normally presumed as the basis for communication. Coparticipants then have to choose between acquiescing in the confabulation, being noncommittal, or indeed correcting the speaker. In this conversation analytical case study of one individual with vascular dementia, I investigate how health-care personnel and volunteers deal with the problem. The data were extracted from a 30-hour video corpus of interactions between one confabulating person and, in total, eight other elderly individuals, three professional caregivers, and a volunteer at a Swedish-speaking day care center for the elderly in Finland. We see how care providers react to confabulations with a range of response practices along the continuum of acquiescence and noncommitment (but not into the more challenging area of correction). Data are in Finland-Swedish with English translation.
Notes
