Difference between revisions of "Bolden2011"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Galina B. Bolden; | |Author(s)=Galina B. Bolden; | ||
| − | |Title=On the | + | |Title=On the organization of repair in multiperson conversation: the case of “other”-selection in other-initiated repair sequences |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; epistemics; progressivity; repair | |Tag(s)=EMCA; epistemics; progressivity; repair | ||
|Key=Bolden2011 | |Key=Bolden2011 | ||
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 | ||
| − | + | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | |
| − | |Journal=Research on Language | ||
|Volume=44 | |Volume=44 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
Latest revision as of 12:48, 27 November 2019
| Bolden2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bolden2011 |
| Author(s) | Galina B. Bolden |
| Title | On the organization of repair in multiperson conversation: the case of “other”-selection in other-initiated repair sequences |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, epistemics, progressivity, repair |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 44 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 237–262 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2011.591835 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines a previously undocumented way in which the presence of more than two interlocutors matters for the organization of repair (Schegloff, Jefferson, & Sacks, 1977): when the repair initiation is addressed to—and thereby selects as the next speaker—somebody other than the speaker of the trouble-source turn (“other”-selection, for short). The speaker of the trouble-source turn is ordinarily the one who is selected to repair it (Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson, 1974). Under what circumstances, then, is “other”-selection used? The analysis shows that, while rare, “other”-selection in other-initiation of repair is a systematically deployed practice. In selecting somebody other than the speaker of the trouble-source turn to provide a repair solution, the repair initiator orients to two broad considerations (sometimes concurrently): progressivity and social epistemics. The article examines how these considerations play out in a variety of contexts and considers implications of “other”-selection for our understanding of the repair organization.
Notes
