Difference between revisions of "Ahopelto2025"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Teija Ahopelto; Melisa Stevanovic; Johanna Ruusuvuori; |Title=Perceived personality: Noticing interactional conduct in recruitment inter...") |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Year=2025 | |Year=2025 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| + | |Journal=Qualitative Psychology | ||
| + | |DOI=https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000340 | ||
|Abstract=Assessing personality in recruitment interviews is an interactionally delicate task, especially when applicants’ earlier self-descriptions are in contrast to recruiters’ real-time observations of their conduct. This study examines how such observations—termed metainteractional personality noticings—are used in Finnish job interviews. Drawing on 21 video-recorded interviews and applying tools from conversation analysis and discursive psychology, we show how recruiters use metainteractional personality noticings to assess consistency between applicants’ self-descriptions, personality test results, and behavior in the interactional moment. These noticings may be framed as concordances or discrepancies. This prompts applicants to reinforce the consistency of their descriptions or demonstrate their personal development over time, thereby managing the appearance of genuineness and truthfulness in locally situated ways. Our findings demonstrate that metainteractional personality noticings serve as a powerful interactional resource for shaping what counts as credible and truthful accounts of personality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved) | |Abstract=Assessing personality in recruitment interviews is an interactionally delicate task, especially when applicants’ earlier self-descriptions are in contrast to recruiters’ real-time observations of their conduct. This study examines how such observations—termed metainteractional personality noticings—are used in Finnish job interviews. Drawing on 21 video-recorded interviews and applying tools from conversation analysis and discursive psychology, we show how recruiters use metainteractional personality noticings to assess consistency between applicants’ self-descriptions, personality test results, and behavior in the interactional moment. These noticings may be framed as concordances or discrepancies. This prompts applicants to reinforce the consistency of their descriptions or demonstrate their personal development over time, thereby managing the appearance of genuineness and truthfulness in locally situated ways. Our findings demonstrate that metainteractional personality noticings serve as a powerful interactional resource for shaping what counts as credible and truthful accounts of personality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:29, 30 June 2026
| Ahopelto2025 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ahopelto2025 |
| Author(s) | Teija Ahopelto, Melisa Stevanovic, Johanna Ruusuvuori |
| Title | Perceived personality: Noticing interactional conduct in recruitment interviews |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, personality, Recruitment interviews, personality test |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association |
| Year | 2025 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Psychology |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000340 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Assessing personality in recruitment interviews is an interactionally delicate task, especially when applicants’ earlier self-descriptions are in contrast to recruiters’ real-time observations of their conduct. This study examines how such observations—termed metainteractional personality noticings—are used in Finnish job interviews. Drawing on 21 video-recorded interviews and applying tools from conversation analysis and discursive psychology, we show how recruiters use metainteractional personality noticings to assess consistency between applicants’ self-descriptions, personality test results, and behavior in the interactional moment. These noticings may be framed as concordances or discrepancies. This prompts applicants to reinforce the consistency of their descriptions or demonstrate their personal development over time, thereby managing the appearance of genuineness and truthfulness in locally situated ways. Our findings demonstrate that metainteractional personality noticings serve as a powerful interactional resource for shaping what counts as credible and truthful accounts of personality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)
Notes
