Difference between revisions of "YYang2025"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Yuchen Yang |Title=Gender Uptake: Theorizing the Semiotics of (Un)Doing Gender |Tag(s)=EMCA; Accounts; Categorization; Childhood; Doing...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Yuchen Yang | |Author(s)=Yuchen Yang | ||
|Title=Gender Uptake: Theorizing the Semiotics of (Un)Doing Gender | |Title=Gender Uptake: Theorizing the Semiotics of (Un)Doing Gender | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Accounts; Categorization; Childhood; Doing gender; Ethnomethodology; Pragmatist semiotics | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Accounts; Categorization; Childhood; Doing gender; Ethnomethodology; Pragmatist semiotics |
|Key=YYang2025 | |Key=YYang2025 | ||
|Year=2025 | |Year=2025 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Sociological Theory | |Journal=Sociological Theory | ||
| − | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi | + | |Volume=43 |
| + | |Number=4 | ||
| + | |Pages=360–384 | ||
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07352751251368897 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/07352751251368897 | |DOI=10.1177/07352751251368897 | ||
|Abstract=“Doing Gender” is often read as a theory of how people signify femininity/masculinity via expressive “performances.” This prevailing interpretation falls short of what the theory calls for—an ethnomethodologically informed analysis of gender’s emergent “naturalness.” To further this agenda, I theorize the audience’s “gender uptake” as a central component of doing gender by elaborating ethnomethodology’s attention to interpretive acts. Integrating Dorothy Smith’s intellectual legacy for feminist interpretive sociology, ethnomethodology’s neglected insight on categorization, and cultural sociology’s recent rediscovery of Peircean semiotics, I argue the facticity of gender’s “naturalness” remains underdetermined until the audience makes a series of ideological moves that cannot be predetermined by the performer. With case studies of how feminist parents account for their children’s gender-stereotypical interests, I illustrate how this audience-centered approach helps us unpack the interactional production/naturalization of categorical differences processually as open-ended negotiation of sign relations, where meaning emerges from selective attention. | |Abstract=“Doing Gender” is often read as a theory of how people signify femininity/masculinity via expressive “performances.” This prevailing interpretation falls short of what the theory calls for—an ethnomethodologically informed analysis of gender’s emergent “naturalness.” To further this agenda, I theorize the audience’s “gender uptake” as a central component of doing gender by elaborating ethnomethodology’s attention to interpretive acts. Integrating Dorothy Smith’s intellectual legacy for feminist interpretive sociology, ethnomethodology’s neglected insight on categorization, and cultural sociology’s recent rediscovery of Peircean semiotics, I argue the facticity of gender’s “naturalness” remains underdetermined until the audience makes a series of ideological moves that cannot be predetermined by the performer. With case studies of how feminist parents account for their children’s gender-stereotypical interests, I illustrate how this audience-centered approach helps us unpack the interactional production/naturalization of categorical differences processually as open-ended negotiation of sign relations, where meaning emerges from selective attention. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:41, 9 December 2025
| YYang2025 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | YYang2025 |
| Author(s) | Yuchen Yang |
| Title | Gender Uptake: Theorizing the Semiotics of (Un)Doing Gender |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Accounts, Categorization, Childhood, Doing gender, Ethnomethodology, Pragmatist semiotics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2025 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociological Theory |
| Volume | 43 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 360–384 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/07352751251368897 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
“Doing Gender” is often read as a theory of how people signify femininity/masculinity via expressive “performances.” This prevailing interpretation falls short of what the theory calls for—an ethnomethodologically informed analysis of gender’s emergent “naturalness.” To further this agenda, I theorize the audience’s “gender uptake” as a central component of doing gender by elaborating ethnomethodology’s attention to interpretive acts. Integrating Dorothy Smith’s intellectual legacy for feminist interpretive sociology, ethnomethodology’s neglected insight on categorization, and cultural sociology’s recent rediscovery of Peircean semiotics, I argue the facticity of gender’s “naturalness” remains underdetermined until the audience makes a series of ideological moves that cannot be predetermined by the performer. With case studies of how feminist parents account for their children’s gender-stereotypical interests, I illustrate how this audience-centered approach helps us unpack the interactional production/naturalization of categorical differences processually as open-ended negotiation of sign relations, where meaning emerges from selective attention.
Notes
