Difference between revisions of "Kuttner2014"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Uwe Küttner |Title=Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure? – An initial observation on rhythmicity and projection |Editor(s)=Dag...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Uwe Küttner | |Author(s)=Uwe Küttner | ||
| − | |Title=Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure? | + | |Title=Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure? An initial observation on rhythmicity and projection |
| − | |Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Beatrice Szczepek Reed; | + | |Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Beatrice Szczepek Reed; |
| − | |Tag(s)=Prosody; | + | |Tag(s)=Prosody; |
|Key=Kuttner2014 | |Key=Kuttner2014 | ||
| + | |Publisher=Verlag für Gesprächsforschung | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion Prosody and phonetics in interaction | + | |Language=English |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Address=Göttingen |
| + | |Booktitle=Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion / Prosody and phonetics in interaction | ||
| + | |Pages=46–69 | ||
| + | |URL=http://verlag-gespraechsforschung.de/2014/pdf/kuettner-audio.pdf | ||
| + | |Abstract=This paper reports a problematic case of unequivocally evidencing participant orientation to the projective force of some turn-initial demonstrative wh-clefts (DCs) within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL). Conducting rhythmic analyses appears helpful in this regard, in that they disclose rhythmic regularities which suggest a speaker's orientation towards a projected turn continuation. In this particular case, rhythmic analyses can therefore be shown to meaningfully complement sequential analyses and analyses of turn-design, so as to gather additional evidence for participant orientations. In conclusion, I will point to possibly more extensive relations between rhythmicity and projection and proffer a tentative outlook for the usability of rhythmic analyses as an analytic tool in CA and IL. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:49, 9 December 2019
| Kuttner2014 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Kuttner2014 |
| Author(s) | Uwe Küttner |
| Title | Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure? An initial observation on rhythmicity and projection |
| Editor(s) | Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Beatrice Szczepek Reed |
| Tag(s) | Prosody |
| Publisher | Verlag für Gesprächsforschung |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | English |
| City | Göttingen |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 46–69 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion / Prosody and phonetics in interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper reports a problematic case of unequivocally evidencing participant orientation to the projective force of some turn-initial demonstrative wh-clefts (DCs) within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL). Conducting rhythmic analyses appears helpful in this regard, in that they disclose rhythmic regularities which suggest a speaker's orientation towards a projected turn continuation. In this particular case, rhythmic analyses can therefore be shown to meaningfully complement sequential analyses and analyses of turn-design, so as to gather additional evidence for participant orientations. In conclusion, I will point to possibly more extensive relations between rhythmicity and projection and proffer a tentative outlook for the usability of rhythmic analyses as an analytic tool in CA and IL.
Notes
