Difference between revisions of "Reber2020a"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-12-17 08:02:06) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Elisabeth Reber; |
|Title=Visuo-material performances: 'Literalized’ quotations in prime minister’s questions | |Title=Visuo-material performances: 'Literalized’ quotations in prime minister’s questions | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Visio-material performances; Interactional Linguistics; Persuasion | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Visio-material performances; Interactional Linguistics; Persuasion | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Reber2020a |
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
| − | | | + | |Language=English |
|Journal=AILA Review | |Journal=AILA Review | ||
|Volume=33 | |Volume=33 | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00036.reb | |URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00036.reb | ||
|DOI=10.1075/aila.00036.reb | |DOI=10.1075/aila.00036.reb | ||
| − | |Abstract= | + | |Abstract=Drawn from a larger project on reported speech in parliamentary interaction (Reber, forthcoming), this paper studies visuo-material performances of so-called “literalized” (Rumsey, 1992) quoting, i.e., verbatim reproductions of original utterances. Taking an interactional-linguistic perspective, I analyze how participants accomplish ‘literalized’ reported speech through vocal, verbal, and visual cues, recruiting their material documents. The data are culled from video recordings of Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), a parliamentary session where the Prime Minister (PM) takes questions from the Leader of the Opposition (LO) and Members of Parliament (MPs) at the British House of Commons. I place my focus on cases where speakers use original documents as visual aids, a classic rhetoric device of persuasion, and show how paper documents are constituted, celebrated, and rhetorically enacted as (seemingly) original documents in embodied, situated ways. As a conclusion, I argue that the display of original documents allows the speaker to make claims of having not only evidential but also experiential access to their sources, a practice that underpins their evidential authority. |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:52, 22 March 2023
| Reber2020a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Reber2020a |
| Author(s) | Elisabeth Reber |
| Title | Visuo-material performances: 'Literalized’ quotations in prime minister’s questions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Visio-material performances, Interactional Linguistics, Persuasion |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | AILA Review |
| Volume | 33 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 176–203 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/aila.00036.reb |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Drawn from a larger project on reported speech in parliamentary interaction (Reber, forthcoming), this paper studies visuo-material performances of so-called “literalized” (Rumsey, 1992) quoting, i.e., verbatim reproductions of original utterances. Taking an interactional-linguistic perspective, I analyze how participants accomplish ‘literalized’ reported speech through vocal, verbal, and visual cues, recruiting their material documents. The data are culled from video recordings of Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), a parliamentary session where the Prime Minister (PM) takes questions from the Leader of the Opposition (LO) and Members of Parliament (MPs) at the British House of Commons. I place my focus on cases where speakers use original documents as visual aids, a classic rhetoric device of persuasion, and show how paper documents are constituted, celebrated, and rhetorically enacted as (seemingly) original documents in embodied, situated ways. As a conclusion, I argue that the display of original documents allows the speaker to make claims of having not only evidential but also experiential access to their sources, a practice that underpins their evidential authority.
Notes
