Difference between revisions of "Laury2021"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Ritva Laury; |Title=Definitely indefinite: Negotiating intersubjective common ground in everyday interaction in Finnish |Editor(s)=...") |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Ritva Laury; | |Author(s)=Ritva Laury; | ||
|Title=Definitely indefinite: Negotiating intersubjective common ground in everyday interaction in Finnish | |Title=Definitely indefinite: Negotiating intersubjective common ground in everyday interaction in Finnish | ||
| − | |Editor(s)=Jan Lindström; Ritva Laury; | + | |Editor(s)=Jan Lindström; Ritva Laury; Anssi Peräkylä; Marja-Leena Sorjonen; |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Intersubjetivity; Conversation analysis | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Intersubjetivity; Conversation analysis | ||
|Key=Laury2021 | |Key=Laury2021 | ||
Latest revision as of 04:58, 6 December 2021
| Laury2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Laury2021 |
| Author(s) | Ritva Laury |
| Title | Definitely indefinite: Negotiating intersubjective common ground in everyday interaction in Finnish |
| Editor(s) | Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä, Marja-Leena Sorjonen |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Intersubjetivity, Conversation analysis |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 41-60 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This chapter concerns expressions which seem internally contradictory because they consist of both a recognitional and a non-recognitional element. They contain both the Finnish demonstrative se ‘that, the’, a recognitional, as in se ihminen ‘that/the person’, and one of the indefinite determiners yksi ‘one’, semmonen ‘such’, and joku ‘some’, all of which are non-recognitionals, resulting in expressions such as se joku ihminen ‘that/the some person’. The chapter shows that each of these expressions has its own home environment and expresses a distinct epistemic stance. The main findings are that these expressions constitute a fine-grained resource for the negotiation of relative epistemic status and are tools for building intersubjective common ground in interaction.
Notes
