Difference between revisions of "Antaki2002"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Charles Antaki; |Title=”Lovely”: Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Antaki2002 |Year=200...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Charles Antaki; | + | |Author(s)=Charles Antaki; |
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=“Lovely”: Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; telephone closings; assessments |
|Key=Antaki2002 | |Key=Antaki2002 | ||
|Year=2002 | |Year=2002 | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=4 | |Volume=4 | ||
| − | |Number= | + | |Number=1 |
| + | |Pages=5–23 | ||
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614456020040010101 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1177/14614456020040010101 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Do high-grade assessments (such as “lovely” and “brilliant”) have a use in marking episodes in mundane conversation? Inspection suggests that closing sequences in telephone conversations, when they include such embedded actions as making arrangements, have a slot which can be filled by a turn-initial high-grade assessment. I suggest that the high-grade assessment makes a special display of resuming a closing which had been suspended. I make a link between marked resumption in such mundane closings and more institutional agenda-marking, and speculate that using a resumptive high-grade assessment might display a claim to `ownership' of the closedown sequence. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:08, 30 October 2019
| Antaki2002 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Antaki2002 |
| Author(s) | Charles Antaki |
| Title | “Lovely”: Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, telephone closings, assessments |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 5–23 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614456020040010101 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Do high-grade assessments (such as “lovely” and “brilliant”) have a use in marking episodes in mundane conversation? Inspection suggests that closing sequences in telephone conversations, when they include such embedded actions as making arrangements, have a slot which can be filled by a turn-initial high-grade assessment. I suggest that the high-grade assessment makes a special display of resuming a closing which had been suspended. I make a link between marked resumption in such mundane closings and more institutional agenda-marking, and speculate that using a resumptive high-grade assessment might display a claim to `ownership' of the closedown sequence.
Notes
