Difference between revisions of "Watson1998a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rodney Watson; |Title=Ethnomethodology, Consciousness and Self |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Watson1998a |Year=1998 |Language=English |Journal=Jour...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Rodney Watson; | |Author(s)=Rodney Watson; | ||
| − | |Title=Ethnomethodology, | + | |Title=Ethnomethodology, consciousness and self |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | ||
|Key=Watson1998a | |Key=Watson1998a | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=5 | |Volume=5 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=202–223 |
| + | |URL=https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/1998/00000005/00000002/art00006 | ||
|Abstract=In this paper I shall outline the approach to consciousness adopted by ethnomethodology and its ‘associate’ conversation(al) analysis. I shall attempt to do this by taking a minimalist stance, namely a basic formulation of the elements of these approaches, trying to strip away the ornate superstructures which have been erected upon that basis. I shall proceed in two ways. First, I shall seek to define ethnomethodology and conversation analysis by contrasting them to varying degrees with a variety of other approaches: symbolic interactionism and, derivatively, the work of Goffman, the -social psychology of Rom Harre and his associates and with Norbert Wiley. Secondly, I shall give some examples of the use of the notion of ‘self’held by ethnomethodologists and conversation analysts that take a definitive turn towards a non-ironic, non-mentalist, non-essentialist and non-cognitivist approach to knowledge, consciousness and self. | |Abstract=In this paper I shall outline the approach to consciousness adopted by ethnomethodology and its ‘associate’ conversation(al) analysis. I shall attempt to do this by taking a minimalist stance, namely a basic formulation of the elements of these approaches, trying to strip away the ornate superstructures which have been erected upon that basis. I shall proceed in two ways. First, I shall seek to define ethnomethodology and conversation analysis by contrasting them to varying degrees with a variety of other approaches: symbolic interactionism and, derivatively, the work of Goffman, the -social psychology of Rom Harre and his associates and with Norbert Wiley. Secondly, I shall give some examples of the use of the notion of ‘self’held by ethnomethodologists and conversation analysts that take a definitive turn towards a non-ironic, non-mentalist, non-essentialist and non-cognitivist approach to knowledge, consciousness and self. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:23, 27 October 2019
| Watson1998a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Watson1998a |
| Author(s) | Rodney Watson |
| Title | Ethnomethodology, consciousness and self |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1998 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Consciousness Studies |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 202–223 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this paper I shall outline the approach to consciousness adopted by ethnomethodology and its ‘associate’ conversation(al) analysis. I shall attempt to do this by taking a minimalist stance, namely a basic formulation of the elements of these approaches, trying to strip away the ornate superstructures which have been erected upon that basis. I shall proceed in two ways. First, I shall seek to define ethnomethodology and conversation analysis by contrasting them to varying degrees with a variety of other approaches: symbolic interactionism and, derivatively, the work of Goffman, the -social psychology of Rom Harre and his associates and with Norbert Wiley. Secondly, I shall give some examples of the use of the notion of ‘self’held by ethnomethodologists and conversation analysts that take a definitive turn towards a non-ironic, non-mentalist, non-essentialist and non-cognitivist approach to knowledge, consciousness and self.
Notes
