Difference between revisions of "Simmons-LeCouteur2011"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Katie Simmons; Amanda LeCouteur; |Title=“Hypothetical active-voicing”: Therapists ‘modelling’ of clients’ future conversations...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Katie Simmons; Amanda LeCouteur; | |Author(s)=Katie Simmons; Amanda LeCouteur; | ||
| − | |Title=“Hypothetical active-voicing”: | + | |Title=“Hypothetical active-voicing”: therapists ‘modelling’ of clients’ future conversations in CBT interactions |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Hypothetical active-voicing; Direct reported speech; Conversation analysis; Modelling; CBT | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Hypothetical active-voicing; Direct reported speech; Conversation analysis; Modelling; CBT | ||
|Key=Simmons-LeCouteur2011 | |Key=Simmons-LeCouteur2011 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=43 | |Volume=43 | ||
|Number=13 | |Number=13 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=3177–3192 |
| + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216611001676 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.002 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.002 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This paper focuses on a conversational resource we call ‘hypothetical active-voicing’ (HAV). | + | |Abstract=This paper focuses on a conversational resource we call ‘hypothetical active-voicing’ (HAV). The practice involves a speaker enacting hypothetical talk that their interlocutor might use in a future situation. The data come from a corpus of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy sessions, in sequences that involve therapists proposing strategies to clients for behavioural change. The ways in which therapists routinely enacted ‘hypothetical active-voicing’ will be discussed, along with consideration of the interactional accomplishments of this practice. It will be demonstrated that the HAV device can be used as a way for therapists to pre-empt resistance from clients when making proposals for behavioural change. It is typically deployed in sequential environments where resistance has already become relevant to the interaction. |
| − | |||
| − | a future situation. The data come | ||
| − | sequences that involve therapists proposing strategies to clients for behavioural change. The | ||
| − | ways in which therapists routinely enacted ‘hypothetical active-voicing’ will be discussed, | ||
| − | along with consideration of the interactional accomplishments of this practice. It will be | ||
| − | demonstrated that | ||
| − | from clients when making proposals for behavioural change. It is typically deployed in | ||
| − | sequential environments where resistance has already become relevant to the interaction. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:01, 28 November 2019
| Simmons-LeCouteur2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Simmons-LeCouteur2011 |
| Author(s) | Katie Simmons, Amanda LeCouteur |
| Title | “Hypothetical active-voicing”: therapists ‘modelling’ of clients’ future conversations in CBT interactions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Hypothetical active-voicing, Direct reported speech, Conversation analysis, Modelling, CBT |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 43 |
| Number | 13 |
| Pages | 3177–3192 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.002 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper focuses on a conversational resource we call ‘hypothetical active-voicing’ (HAV). The practice involves a speaker enacting hypothetical talk that their interlocutor might use in a future situation. The data come from a corpus of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy sessions, in sequences that involve therapists proposing strategies to clients for behavioural change. The ways in which therapists routinely enacted ‘hypothetical active-voicing’ will be discussed, along with consideration of the interactional accomplishments of this practice. It will be demonstrated that the HAV device can be used as a way for therapists to pre-empt resistance from clients when making proposals for behavioural change. It is typically deployed in sequential environments where resistance has already become relevant to the interaction.
Notes
