Difference between revisions of "Seuren2018a"
BurakTekin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes; Tom Koole; |Title=Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences |Tag(s)=EMCA; change-of-state...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes; Tom Koole; | + | |Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes; Tom Koole; |
|Title=Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences | |Title=Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; change-of-state; action formation | |Tag(s)=EMCA; change-of-state; action formation | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=47 | |Volume=47 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=409–434 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/resolving-knowledge-discrepancies-in-informing-sequences/973452F32E8729A9BB6AA6F42B532FED |
| + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404518000362 | ||
|Abstract=This article investigates a specific practice that recipients in Dutch talk-in-in- teraction use when responding to turns that have as one of their main jobs to inform. By responding to an informing turn with an oh-prefaced nonrepeating response that has yes/no-type interrogative word order, recipients treat that turn as counter to expectation and request both confirmation of the inference formulated in his/her response, as well as reconciliatory information for the two discrepant states of affairs. This practice is compared to similar cases where the nonrepeating response is not oh-prefaced to show that such turns implement different actions. Data are in Dutch with English translations. | |Abstract=This article investigates a specific practice that recipients in Dutch talk-in-in- teraction use when responding to turns that have as one of their main jobs to inform. By responding to an informing turn with an oh-prefaced nonrepeating response that has yes/no-type interrogative word order, recipients treat that turn as counter to expectation and request both confirmation of the inference formulated in his/her response, as well as reconciliatory information for the two discrepant states of affairs. This practice is compared to similar cases where the nonrepeating response is not oh-prefaced to show that such turns implement different actions. Data are in Dutch with English translations. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:57, 12 January 2020
| Seuren2018a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Seuren2018a |
| Author(s) | Lucas M. Seuren, Mike Huiskes, Tom Koole |
| Title | Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, change-of-state, action formation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 47 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 409–434 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404518000362 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article investigates a specific practice that recipients in Dutch talk-in-in- teraction use when responding to turns that have as one of their main jobs to inform. By responding to an informing turn with an oh-prefaced nonrepeating response that has yes/no-type interrogative word order, recipients treat that turn as counter to expectation and request both confirmation of the inference formulated in his/her response, as well as reconciliatory information for the two discrepant states of affairs. This practice is compared to similar cases where the nonrepeating response is not oh-prefaced to show that such turns implement different actions. Data are in Dutch with English translations.
Notes
