Difference between revisions of "Pilnick2002a"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alison Pilnick; |Title=What 'most people' do: Exploring the ethical implications of genetic counselling |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Con...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Alison Pilnick; | + | |Author(s)=Alison Pilnick; |
| − | |Title=What 'most people' do: | + | |Title=What 'most people' do: exploring the ethical implications of genetic counselling |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Genetic Counseling; Ethics; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Genetic Counseling; Ethics; |
|Key=Pilnick2002a | |Key=Pilnick2002a | ||
|Year=2002 | |Year=2002 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=New Genetics & Society | |Journal=New Genetics & Society | ||
|Volume=21 | |Volume=21 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| − | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14636770216003 | + | |Pages=339–350 |
| − | |DOI= | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14636770216003 |
| + | |DOI=10.1080/14636770216003 | ||
|Abstract=Genetic counselling, and the ethical principles of non-directiveness and client autonomy that counsellors aspire to, are a cornerstone in the defence of genetic practice against accusations of eugenics. This paper examines the practical application of these principles using a conversation analytic approach, arguing that there is a need to pay greater attention to local interactional contexts in analysing counsellors' attainment or otherwise of ethical ideals. | |Abstract=Genetic counselling, and the ethical principles of non-directiveness and client autonomy that counsellors aspire to, are a cornerstone in the defence of genetic practice against accusations of eugenics. This paper examines the practical application of these principles using a conversation analytic approach, arguing that there is a need to pay greater attention to local interactional contexts in analysing counsellors' attainment or otherwise of ethical ideals. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:59, 30 October 2019
| Pilnick2002a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Pilnick2002a |
| Author(s) | Alison Pilnick |
| Title | What 'most people' do: exploring the ethical implications of genetic counselling |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Genetic Counseling, Ethics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | New Genetics & Society |
| Volume | 21 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 339–350 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/14636770216003 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Genetic counselling, and the ethical principles of non-directiveness and client autonomy that counsellors aspire to, are a cornerstone in the defence of genetic practice against accusations of eugenics. This paper examines the practical application of these principles using a conversation analytic approach, arguing that there is a need to pay greater attention to local interactional contexts in analysing counsellors' attainment or otherwise of ethical ideals.
Notes
