Difference between revisions of "Housley2018"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2018-05-18 08:24:04) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=William Housley; |
|Title=Conversation analysis, publics, practitioners and citizen social science | |Title=Conversation analysis, publics, practitioners and citizen social science | ||
| − | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; citizen social science; Conversation Analysis; conversational rollercoaster; Ethnomethodology; publics | |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; citizen social science | + | |Key=Housley2018 |
| − | | | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=20 | |Volume=20 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=431–437 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445618754581 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445618754581 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445618754581 | ||
|Abstract=During the course of this short article, I respond and connect with insights and issues raised by the Conversational Rollercoaster (CR) and its relationship with conversation analysis (CA) and the public science of talk. I constructively engage with the innovative thinking and practice associated with this initiative. Finally, I consider how this might enhance a potential drive to connect ethnomethodology (EM) and CA to additional public and collaborative practices and interventions in the digital age. | |Abstract=During the course of this short article, I respond and connect with insights and issues raised by the Conversational Rollercoaster (CR) and its relationship with conversation analysis (CA) and the public science of talk. I constructively engage with the innovative thinking and practice associated with this initiative. Finally, I consider how this might enhance a potential drive to connect ethnomethodology (EM) and CA to additional public and collaborative practices and interventions in the digital age. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:54, 13 January 2020
| Housley2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Housley2018 |
| Author(s) | William Housley |
| Title | Conversation analysis, publics, practitioners and citizen social science |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, citizen social science, Conversation Analysis, conversational rollercoaster, Ethnomethodology, publics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 431–437 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445618754581 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
During the course of this short article, I respond and connect with insights and issues raised by the Conversational Rollercoaster (CR) and its relationship with conversation analysis (CA) and the public science of talk. I constructively engage with the innovative thinking and practice associated with this initiative. Finally, I consider how this might enhance a potential drive to connect ethnomethodology (EM) and CA to additional public and collaborative practices and interventions in the digital age.
Notes
