Difference between revisions of "McHoul2009"

Latest revision as of 10:26, 23 November 2019

McHoul2009
BibType	ARTICLE
Key	McHoul2009
Author(s)	Alec McHoul
Title	What are we doing when we analyse conversation?
Editor(s)
Tag(s)	EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Ethnomethodology, Phenomenology
Publisher
Year	2009
Language
City
Month
Journal	Australian Journal of Communication
Volume	36
Number	3
Pages	15–21
URL	Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Abstract

Notes

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Author(s)=Alec McHoul;
 |Title=What are we doing when we analyse conversation?
 |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Ethnomethodology; Phenomenology;
 |Key=McHoul2009
 |Year=2009
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 |Volume=36
 |Number=3
-|Pages=15-21
+|Pages=15–21
-|Abstract=Here  I  offer  a  reminder  of  some  of  the  phenomenological  and
+|URL=https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=201002702;res=IELAPA
-ethnomethodological roots of conversation analysis (CA) in the form of a set of ‘field
-propositions’.  Over  the  years,  CA  has  certainly  ‘branched  out’  from  those  roots.
-However, I believe a reminder is timely if we are to prevent a drift towards a rather
-mechanistic approach to the study of everyday cultural objects such as conversations
-and their ilk.
 }}