Difference between revisions of "Toerien2013"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Merran Toerien; Rebecca Shaw; Markus Reuber;
 
|Author(s)=Merran Toerien; Rebecca Shaw; Markus Reuber;
 
|Title=Initiating decision-making in neurology consultations: ‘recommending’ versus ‘option-listing’ and the implications for medical authority
 
|Title=Initiating decision-making in neurology consultations: ‘recommending’ versus ‘option-listing’ and the implications for medical authority
−
|Tag(s)=CA; Medical interaction; Institutional talk; Option-listing; Medical recommendations; Authority; Choice
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Medical interaction; Institutional talk; Option-listing; Medical recommendations; Authority; Choice
 
|Key=Toerien2013
 
|Key=Toerien2013
 
|Year=2013
 
|Year=2013
−
|Month=July
 
 
|Journal=Sociology of Health & Illness
 
|Journal=Sociology of Health & Illness
 
|Volume=35
 
|Volume=35
Line 13: Line 12:
 
|URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.12000/full
 
|URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.12000/full
 
|DOI=10.1111/1467-9566.12000
 
|DOI=10.1111/1467-9566.12000
−
|Abstract=This article compares two practices for initiating treatment decision-making, evident in audio-recorded consultations between a neurologist and 13 patients in two hospital clinics in the UK. We call these ‘recommending’ and ‘option-listing’. The former entails making a proposal to do something; the latter entails the construction of a list of options. Using conversation analysis (CA), we illustrate each, showing that the distinction between these two practices matters to participants. Our analysis centres on two distinctions between the practices: epistemic differences and differences in the slots each creates for the patient’s response. Considering the implications of our findings for understanding medical authority, we argue that option-listing – relative to recommending – is a practice whereby clinicians work to relinquish a little of their authority. This article contributes, then, to a growing body of CA work that offers a more nuanced, tempered account of medical authority than is typically portrayed in the sociological literature. We argue that future CA studies should map out the range of ways – in addition to recommending – in which treatment decision-making is initiated by clinicians. This will allow for further evidence-based contributions to debates on the related concepts of patient participation, choice, shared decision-making and medical authority.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 02:13, 6 August 2020

Toerien2013
BibType ARTICLE
Key Toerien2013
Author(s) Merran Toerien, Rebecca Shaw, Markus Reuber
Title Initiating decision-making in neurology consultations: ‘recommending’ versus ‘option-listing’ and the implications for medical authority
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical EMCA, Medical interaction, Institutional talk, Option-listing, Medical recommendations, Authority, Choice
Publisher
Year 2013
Language
City
Month
Journal Sociology of Health & Illness
Volume 35
Number 6
Pages 873–890
URL Link
DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.12000
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes


Retrieved from "https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Toerien2013&oldid=26079"