Difference between revisions of "Maynard1988a"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard; |Title=Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining |Tag(s)=EMCA; Narratives; Plea Bargaining; Courtroom I...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard; | + | |Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard; |
|Title=Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining | |Title=Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Narratives; Plea Bargaining; Courtroom Interaction; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Narratives; Plea Bargaining; Courtroom Interaction; |
|Key=Maynard1988a | |Key=Maynard1988a | ||
|Year=1988 | |Year=1988 | ||
|Journal=Law and Society Review | |Journal=Law and Society Review | ||
|Volume=22 | |Volume=22 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| − | |URL=https:// | + | |Pages=101–133 |
| − | |Abstract= | + | |URL=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3053625 |
| + | |DOI=10.2307/3053625 | ||
| + | |Abstract=During plea negotiations, attorneys use stories to tell what happened when a defendant was charged with an offense. This paper is concerned with how attorneys tell stories, and includes a consideration of narrative structure and how components of this structure are used in plea negotiations. Components of narrative include: (1) a story entry device; (2) the story itself which may contain a backgrounding segment, action report, and reaction report; and (3) a defense segment in which an attorney denies or explains the defendant's behavior. Systematic employment of these components results in four patterns of negotiations: (1) routine processing, (2) assessing character; (3) disputing facts, and (4) arguing subjectivity. Narrative structure is part of the interaction order of negotiations and is a mechanism through which participants assemble features of a case and aspects of the courtroom setting. Narrators reflexively become part of the stories they tell, which provides a structural motivation for them to perform well during negotiations. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:52, 21 October 2019
| Maynard1988a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Maynard1988a |
| Author(s) | Douglas W. Maynard |
| Title | Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Narratives, Plea Bargaining, Courtroom Interaction |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1988 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Law and Society Review |
| Volume | 22 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 101–133 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.2307/3053625 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
During plea negotiations, attorneys use stories to tell what happened when a defendant was charged with an offense. This paper is concerned with how attorneys tell stories, and includes a consideration of narrative structure and how components of this structure are used in plea negotiations. Components of narrative include: (1) a story entry device; (2) the story itself which may contain a backgrounding segment, action report, and reaction report; and (3) a defense segment in which an attorney denies or explains the defendant's behavior. Systematic employment of these components results in four patterns of negotiations: (1) routine processing, (2) assessing character; (3) disputing facts, and (4) arguing subjectivity. Narrative structure is part of the interaction order of negotiations and is a mechanism through which participants assemble features of a case and aspects of the courtroom setting. Narrators reflexively become part of the stories they tell, which provides a structural motivation for them to perform well during negotiations.
Notes
