Markee2011
| Markee2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Markee2011 |
| Author(s) | Numa Markee |
| Title | Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Conversation analysis, Discursive psychology, Second language acquisition |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 43 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 602–615 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.012 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this paper, I treat avoidance as a locally contingent practice that is collaboratively co- constructed by participants inreal time as a topic of interaction during the course of naturally occurring institutional talk. In order to develop this post-cognitive account of how participants do, and justify doing, avoidance-as-behavior, I draw on ethnomethodological conversation analysis and discursive psychology to frame and explicate a number of emerging issues in the conversation analysis-for-second language acquisition literature. These issues include: (1) How can we respecify individual notions of cognition as socially situated activity? (2) How can we use longitudinal talk to show how participants demonstrably orient in speech event 2 (SE2) to a course of action that first occurred in speech event 1 (SE1)? And (3) howcanwe legitimately use exogenous (that is, talk-external) cultural artifacts (here, a Power Point presentation and a self-evaluation form) as resources for analyzing language learning behavior?
Notes
