Difference between revisions of "Proske-Deppermann2020"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Nadine Proske; Arnulf Deppermann |Title=Right-dislocated complement clauses in German talk-in-interaction: (Re-)specifying proposit...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Nadine Proske; Arnulf Deppermann | |Author(s)=Nadine Proske; Arnulf Deppermann | ||
|Title=Right-dislocated complement clauses in German talk-in-interaction: (Re-)specifying propositional referents of the demonstrative pronoun das | |Title=Right-dislocated complement clauses in German talk-in-interaction: (Re-)specifying propositional referents of the demonstrative pronoun das | ||
| − | |Editor(s)=Yael Maschler | + | |Editor(s)=Yael Maschler; Simona Pekarek Doehler; Jan Lindström; Leelo Keevallik |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; German; Right dislocation; Demonstrative; Grammar; Interactional linguistics | |Tag(s)=EMCA; German; Right dislocation; Demonstrative; Grammar; Interactional linguistics | ||
|Key=Proske-Deppermann2020 | |Key=Proske-Deppermann2020 | ||
| + | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal | + | |Address=Amsterdam |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Booktitle=Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action |
| + | |Pages=275–302 | ||
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.32.10pro | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.32.10pro | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1075/slsi.32.10pro |
|Abstract=This contribution deals with right-dislocated complement clauses with the subordinating conjunction dass (‘that’) in German talk-in-interaction. The bi-clausal construction we analyze is as follows: The first clause, in which one argument is realized by the demonstrative pronoun das (‘this/that’), is syntactically and semantically complete; the reference of the pronoun is (re-)specified by adding a dass-complement clause after a point of possible completion (e.g., aber das hab ich nich MITbekommen. (0.32) dass es da so YOUtubevideos gab. (‘But I wasn’t aware of that. That there were videos about that on YouTube.’). The first clause always performs a backward-oriented action (e.g., an assessment) and the second clause (re-)specifies the propositional reference of the demonstrative, allowing for a (strategic) perspective shift. Based on a collection of 93 cases from everyday conversations and institutional interactions, we found that the construction is used close to the turn-beginning for referring to and (re-)specifying (parts of) another speaker’s prior turn; turn-internal uses tie together parts of a speaker’s multi-unit turn. The construction thus facilitates an incremental constitution of meaning and reference. | |Abstract=This contribution deals with right-dislocated complement clauses with the subordinating conjunction dass (‘that’) in German talk-in-interaction. The bi-clausal construction we analyze is as follows: The first clause, in which one argument is realized by the demonstrative pronoun das (‘this/that’), is syntactically and semantically complete; the reference of the pronoun is (re-)specified by adding a dass-complement clause after a point of possible completion (e.g., aber das hab ich nich MITbekommen. (0.32) dass es da so YOUtubevideos gab. (‘But I wasn’t aware of that. That there were videos about that on YouTube.’). The first clause always performs a backward-oriented action (e.g., an assessment) and the second clause (re-)specifies the propositional reference of the demonstrative, allowing for a (strategic) perspective shift. Based on a collection of 93 cases from everyday conversations and institutional interactions, we found that the construction is used close to the turn-beginning for referring to and (re-)specifying (parts of) another speaker’s prior turn; turn-internal uses tie together parts of a speaker’s multi-unit turn. The construction thus facilitates an incremental constitution of meaning and reference. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:00, 25 February 2020
| Proske-Deppermann2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Proske-Deppermann2020 |
| Author(s) | Nadine Proske, Arnulf Deppermann |
| Title | Right-dislocated complement clauses in German talk-in-interaction: (Re-)specifying propositional referents of the demonstrative pronoun das |
| Editor(s) | Yael Maschler, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström, Leelo Keevallik |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, German, Right dislocation, Demonstrative, Grammar, Interactional linguistics |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 275–302 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/slsi.32.10pro |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This contribution deals with right-dislocated complement clauses with the subordinating conjunction dass (‘that’) in German talk-in-interaction. The bi-clausal construction we analyze is as follows: The first clause, in which one argument is realized by the demonstrative pronoun das (‘this/that’), is syntactically and semantically complete; the reference of the pronoun is (re-)specified by adding a dass-complement clause after a point of possible completion (e.g., aber das hab ich nich MITbekommen. (0.32) dass es da so YOUtubevideos gab. (‘But I wasn’t aware of that. That there were videos about that on YouTube.’). The first clause always performs a backward-oriented action (e.g., an assessment) and the second clause (re-)specifies the propositional reference of the demonstrative, allowing for a (strategic) perspective shift. Based on a collection of 93 cases from everyday conversations and institutional interactions, we found that the construction is used close to the turn-beginning for referring to and (re-)specifying (parts of) another speaker’s prior turn; turn-internal uses tie together parts of a speaker’s multi-unit turn. The construction thus facilitates an incremental constitution of meaning and reference.
Notes
