Difference between revisions of "Barthelemy2008"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (SaulAlbert moved page Barthélémy2008 to Barthelemy2008 without leaving a redirect: using special characters in page names mean the BibTex import system won't work...)
m
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Pages=89-105
 
|Pages=89-105
 
|URL=https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/278342/filename/EthnographicStudies_10_MediaWarsIdentities_2.pdf#page=93
 
|URL=https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/278342/filename/EthnographicStudies_10_MediaWarsIdentities_2.pdf#page=93
 +
|Abstract=The aim of  this study  is  to analyse  in detail the  endogenous  interactional  work  through which  speakers  identify  themselves  and  are identified  by  the  others  as  taking  such  and such stand on the topic at stake, through the activation  of  different  kinds  of  public  in order  to make  their standpoint explicit. This analytic approach is based on the description of  the  practical  methods  routinely  used  by members  in  order  to  understand  each  other in  the  course  of  their  activity. Within  this
 +
framework,  the panel  interview under  study appears  as  an  instance  of  a  reception-in-action”  concerning  a  topic  abundantly addressed  by media  in  this  period  of  time, June 2003 which gave rise to divergent, even opposed  views  from  the  media  themselves and  from  commentators  and  audiences  as well.  Our  main  focus  will  be  the  way  in which  the  broadcast’s  guests  show  their concern with the media and political aspects of  the  topic,  not  just  as  a  personal  interest, but  as members  of  a  public  they  outline  in the way  they  take part  in  the  sequential and
 +
topical organization of the panel interview.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 04:49, 1 August 2017

Barthelemy2008
BibType ARTICLE
Key Barthelemy2008
Author(s) Michel Barthélémy
Title Reception-in-action in a panel interview: The interactional production claims in the media
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnography, Media, Interview
Publisher
Year 2008
Language
City
Month
Journal Ethnographic Studies
Volume 10
Number
Pages 89-105
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse in detail the endogenous interactional work through which speakers identify themselves and are identified by the others as taking such and such stand on the topic at stake, through the activation of different kinds of public in order to make their standpoint explicit. This analytic approach is based on the description of the practical methods routinely used by members in order to understand each other in the course of their activity. Within this framework, the panel interview under study appears as an instance of a reception-in-action” concerning a topic abundantly addressed by media in this period of time, June 2003 which gave rise to divergent, even opposed views from the media themselves and from commentators and audiences as well. Our main focus will be the way in which the broadcast’s guests show their concern with the media and political aspects of the topic, not just as a personal interest, but as members of a public they outline in the way they take part in the sequential and topical organization of the panel interview.

Notes