<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://emcawiki.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Shaw2020</id>
	<title>Shaw2020 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://emcawiki.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Shaw2020"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Shaw2020&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-09T07:58:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Shaw2020&amp;diff=24712&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>AndreiKorbut: Created page with &quot;{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Chloe Shaw; Chris Lo; Anne Lanceley; Sarah Hales; Gary Rodin; |Title=The Assessment of Mentalization: Measures for the Patient, the Ther...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Shaw2020&amp;diff=24712&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2020-02-25T05:27:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Chloe Shaw; Chris Lo; Anne Lanceley; Sarah Hales; Gary Rodin; |Title=The Assessment of Mentalization: Measures for the Patient, the Ther...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{BibEntry&lt;br /&gt;
|BibType=ARTICLE&lt;br /&gt;
|Author(s)=Chloe Shaw; Chris Lo; Anne Lanceley; Sarah Hales; Gary Rodin;&lt;br /&gt;
|Title=The Assessment of Mentalization: Measures for the Patient, the Therapist and the Interaction&lt;br /&gt;
|Tag(s)=EMCA;&lt;br /&gt;
|Key=Shaw2020&lt;br /&gt;
|Year=2020&lt;br /&gt;
|Language=English&lt;br /&gt;
|Journal=Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume=50&lt;br /&gt;
|Number=1&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages=57–65&lt;br /&gt;
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10879-019-09420-z&lt;br /&gt;
|DOI=10.1007/s10879-019-09420-z&lt;br /&gt;
|Abstract=Mentalization has been clearly defined in the literature as a relational concept and yet in surveys and transcript-based measures it is almost universally treated as an individual capacity. That approach has value but may not capture the emergent nature of mentalization, as it is jointly constructed within a relational context. We report here on a critical evaluation of measurement approaches commonly used to conceptualize and assess mentalization and argue for the value of conversation analysis (CA) as an alternative approach. A variety of approaches have been shown to have utility in assessing mentalization as an individual capacity. We illustrate how conversation analysis allows for an in-depth-analysis of mentalization as it is co-created across different contexts in real-life therapy sessions. This method of analysis shifts the focus from content to process. Conversation analysis is a potentially valuable tool to support training, to assess treatment integrity, and to improve outcomes with mentalization-based interventions.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AndreiKorbut</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>