emcawiki - User contributions [en]

JordinPino2026

2026-03-31T08:50:19Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jordin, Kathryn; Marco Pino; Laura Jenkins; Emma Richardson; |Title=King and Queen, Mummy and Daddy: Role Play, Gender Categorisation an..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Jordin, Kathryn; Marco Pino; Laura Jenkins; Emma Richardson;
|Title=King and Queen, Mummy and Daddy: Role Play, Gender Categorisation and Cis-Heteronormativity in a UK Preschool Setting
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=JordinPino2026
|Year=2026
|Language=English
|Journal=Feminism & Psychology
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535261419839
|DOI=10.1177/09593535261419839
|Abstract=Children are socialised to understand themselves and others through gender categories. However, there are few observational studies of how this happens in social interaction. Based on video-recorded interactions at a UK preschool nursery setting, this study uses ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to examine the extent and ways cis-heteronormativity is reproduced through gendered descriptions in interactions involving children and adults in preschool role-play activities. The everyday play activities of 26 children (3–4 years old) were video-recorded over a period of 6 months, totalling 7 hours of recordings. Four episodes of role play were identified in which children used gendered descriptions to organise and allocate roles to themselves and other children. One adult used gendered descriptions to validate or correct the children's role allocations. The children's and the adult's actions in many ways reproduced cis-heteronormative assumptions of identities and relationships. These assumptions were integral to the ways in which they made sense of one another's actions and organised their participation within emerging role-play scenes. The children's role allocations nevertheless sometimes departed from cis-normative expectations, thus leading to a composite picture. This study contributes to a growing body of research that highlights the ways in which gender normativities can shape interaction.
}}

LandPino2025

2025-08-28T13:14:44Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Victoria Land; Marco Pino; |Title=Patient cues about end-of-life matters: An observational study of palliative care consultations using..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Victoria Land; Marco Pino;
|Title=Patient cues about end-of-life matters: An observational study of palliative care consultations using conversation analysis
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=LandPino2025
|Year=2025
|Language=English
|Journal=Patient Education and Counseling
|Volume=139
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2025.109243
|DOI=10.1016/j.pec.2025.109243
|Abstract=Objective
This article examines instances of patients making allusive or ambiguous potential reference to death and dying (cues) and analyses how they are built and received in consultations.
Methods
Conversation analysis of video and audio recorded interactions in a large UK hospice. These consultations occurred between patients and companions and a variety of healthcare professionals (HCPs), comprising six palliative medicine consultants, five occupational therapists, and three physiotherapists.
Results
Patients may foreground the end-of-life (EoL) aspect of a cue by, for example, producing it while launching a topic or making a pronouncement/report. This exerts sequential pressure for HCPs to address the EoL implication (unmarked case), but HCPs may avoid engaging with it (marked case). Sometimes, patients allusively or ambiguously refer to death and dying in the course of another interactional activity, thereby backgrounding the EoL implication. The unmarked case involves the HCP attending to the ongoing activity, which maintains the backgrounding. However, HCPs can target the EoL implications in cues produced in the service of other activities or in cases in which the patient has unpacked with a non-EoL concern.
Conclusion
Although not determinative, the sequential environment in which the cue is deployed shapes how HCPs respond to it. This is important because it permits HCPs avenues for engaging in EoL discussion.
Practice implications
HCPs can better understand the interactional work done with cue like utterances if there are contextualised in the ongoing sequence of interaction. For patients reticent to talk about EoL issues, stepwise engagement with the topic, even when EoL has been backgrounded may provide an opportunity for discussing difficult but essential topics.
}}

PaananenPino2025

2025-05-30T12:46:50Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jenny Paananen; Marco Pino; |Title=Turning Toward the Inevitable: How Nursing Home Staff Manage Relatives’ Expectations of Dementia Pr..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Jenny Paananen; Marco Pino;
|Title=Turning Toward the Inevitable: How Nursing Home Staff Manage Relatives’ Expectations of Dementia Progression
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=PaananenPino2025
|Year=2025
|Language=English
|Journal=Research On Language and Social Interaction
|Volume=58
|Number=2
|Pages=165-187
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2025.2484994
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2025.2484994
|Abstract=This article examines video recordings of care plan meetings between nursing home care staff and relatives of residents with dementia in Finland. Prominent in these meetings is the activity of updating relatives about a resident’s condition. An associated practical task for the staff is to assist relatives in making sense of a resident’s observed and reported deterioration. The staff employ inevitability claims, whereby they state that a resident’s health will inevitably deteriorate further. This action normalizes deterioration by attributing it to dementia, and it enables the staff to account for a resident’s present, observed deterioration and to guide relatives’ expectations for the future. In doing so, the staff attend to epistemic considerations by avoiding claiming that relatives are unaware of the realities of dementia and, rather, invoking dementia as an already familiar reality. Data are in Finnish.
}}

Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions (Loughborough University)

2025-05-29T08:37:26Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions (Loughborough University)
|Short title=CA&healthcare2025
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions (Loughborough University)
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Led by Marco Pino and co-organised by Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, and Katie Jordin
Loughborough University

Thursday 11th and Friday 12th September 2025

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology including data analysis and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (BST) on the first day and 9am-4pm (BST) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. The workshop will feature practical sessions and small-group work on video data provided by the facilitators. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day. There will also be some preparatory readings ahead of the workshop.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £150
- For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £30
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA (including through self-study) and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

Deadline for applications: 13th June 2025. Decisions will be communicated by the 20th of June 2025.

We will allocate places based on these criteria:
• Being an applicant from regions where there are fewer CA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA)
• Familiarity with CA
|Year=2025
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2025/09/11
|To date=2025/09/12
|Location=52.7721, -1.20617
|Submission deadline=2025/06/13
|Notification date=2025/06/20
}}

Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions (Loughborough University)

2025-05-29T08:31:22Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{Announcement |Announcement Type=Workshop |Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions (Loughborough University) |Short title=CA&healthcar..."

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions (Loughborough University)
|Short title=CA&healthcare2025
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions (Loughborough University)
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Led by Marco Pino and co-organised by Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, and Katie Jordin
Loughborough University

Thursday 11th and Friday 12th September 2025

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology including data analysis and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (BST) on the first day and 9am-4pm (BST) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. The workshop will feature practical sessions and small-group work on video data provided by the facilitators. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day. There will also be some preparatory readings ahead of the workshop.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £150
- For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £30
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA (including through self-study) and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

Deadline for applications: 13th June 2025. Decisions will be communicated by the 20th of June 2025.

We will allocate places based on these criteria:
• Being an applicant from regions where there are fewer CA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA)
• Familiarity with CA
|Year=2025
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2025/06/11
|To date=2025/06/12
|Location=52.7721, -1.20617
|Submission deadline=2025/06/13
|Notification date=2025/06/20
}}

PhD studentship "Identity work in palliative care" (Loughborough University)

2025-01-20T16:10:23Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{Announcement |Announcement Type=Job |Full title=PhD studentship 'Identity work in palliative care' (Loughborough University) |Short title=PhD studentship |Short summary=Iden..."

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Job
|Full title=PhD studentship 'Identity work in palliative care' (Loughborough University)
|Short title=PhD studentship
|Short summary=Identity work in palliative care: A Conversation Analytic study of interactions with newly diagnosed patients.
Loughborough University is inviting applications for an ESRC Doctoral Studentship. Full details at https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/mgsdtp/collaborativ
|Announcement text=Identity work in palliative care: A Conversation Analytic study of interactions with newly diagnosed patients

ESRC DTP Collaborative Studentship

Loughborough University and Treetops Hospice

The Midlands Graduate School is an accredited Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP). One of 15 such partnerships in the UK, the Midlands Graduate School, is a collaboration between the Universities of Warwick, Birmingham, Nottingham, Aston Leicester, Loughborough, De Montfort and Nottingham Trent.

Loughborough University as part of Midlands Graduate School is now inviting applications for an ESRC Doctoral Studentship in association with our collaborative partner Treetops Hospice to commence in October 2025.

The candidate will be based in the Department of Communication and Media at Loughborough University (UK) and will be supervised by Dr Marco Pino and Prof Elizabeth Peel. The project involves conversation analytic research in collaboration with Treetops Hospice (Derby, UK) where the candidate will be supervised by Sharan Harris-Christensen, manager of the Treetops Hospice Education & Development Team.

Treetops Hospice is an independent third-sector organisation delivering palliative care services to the local community. The candidate will work with Harris-Christensen and the staff of the Treetops Hospice Wellbeing Café. The candidate will video-record drop-in information sessions run by registered nurses, occupational therapists, support and information practitioners, and volunteers for newly diagnosed patients and their families. The aim will be to investigate, using conversation analysis methods, interactional practices that the staff use to help patients maintain a positive identity as competent and autonomous individuals after a diagnosis of life-limiting illness. The significance of the project is readily available when considering how a diagnosis of incurable progressive illness, alongside a reduction in functional capacities for daily living, can negatively affect a patient’s identity. We are interested in the ways interactions with healthcare practitioners can support patients in retaining a positive identity, dignity, and “normality in an otherwise changed reality” (Bye, 1998, p. 12).

The project will leverage the distinctive approach of conversation analysis by investigating identity as a practical achievement of participants’ actions in interaction. With support from the supervisory team, the candidate will use conversation analysis methods to examine interactions video-recorded at the Wellbeing Café to identify challenges that patients face in maintaining a positive identity in interaction; identify interactional practices that the staff use to support patients in negotiating a positive identity; and draw implications for social scientific understandings of identity construction after a diagnosis of incurable illness. The project will include qualitative interviews with patients and staff.

The supervisory team have extensive experience of using conversation analysis in video-based studies of interactions in healthcare and social-care settings, including palliative and end-of-life care (please refer to our staff pages for our publications: Pino and Peel). The project will give the candidate solid grounding in social interaction research. They will participate in a thriving research community within the Discourse & Rhetoric Group (DARG), a world-leading research group in language and social interaction. At Treetops Hospice, the candidate will develop transferable skills relevant to the translation of research findings into training and policy recommendations for the healthcare sector. Harris-Christensen is an experienced communication trainer with nursing background, who will co-supervise the candidate and expose them to Treetops Hospice’s extensive work in the design and delivery of communication skills training for practitioners.

We especially welcome applications from candidates with familiarity and experience with using conversation analysis, although this is not necessary to apply for the studentship. Please send informal enquiries to Marco Pino: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk

Application Process

Full details here: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/mgsdtp/collaborativeandjoint/pino_loughborough_-_collab_advert_2025.pdf

Application deadline: 28th February

Note: shortlisted applicants will be interviewed on the 10th of March. The interview will be online on Microsoft Teams. It will be scheduled between 9.00 and 16.00 (GMT).

Midlands Graduate School ESRC DTP

Our ESRC studentships cover fees at the home rate, a maintenance stipend, and extensive support for research training, as well as research activity support grants. Support is available to both home and international applicants. For further details, visit: www.mgsdtp.ac.uk/studentships/eligibility/.

Informal enquiries about the research or the Department of Communication and Media prior to application can be directed to Marco Pino. Email: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk
|Year=2025
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|To date=2025/02/28
}}

England2025

2024-10-10T13:50:25Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ruth England; Marco Pino; |Title=Handling complainable matters in palliative care interactions |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=EnglandPino 2024 |Year..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Ruth England; Marco Pino;
|Title=Handling complainable matters in palliative care interactions
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=EnglandPino 2024
|Year=2024
|Language=English
|Journal=Discorse Studies
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456241284509
|Abstract=The article uses conversation analysis to investigate how patients and companions complain in palliative care interactions recorded in a UK palliative care setting, and how healthcare professionals (HCPs) respond. The patients’ and companions’ actions do not overtly state, and rather imply, complainable matters for which the co-present HCPs can be seen as responsible. This implicitness affords the HCPs opportunities to address the patients’ and companions’ conveyed concerns as problems in search of practical solutions – rather than grievances. We thus witness the somewhat paradoxical outcome that complaints mobilise remedial actions, but in the process, the one complaining is not treated as complaining after all. We propose that this is a way in which institutional realities pre-empt the overt articulation of nascent complaints. Our analyses show that this is very much the outcome of the interactional work collaboratively accomplished by patients, companions and HCPs. The interactions are in British English.
}}

ParryPinoHarris-Christensen2024

2024-07-19T09:35:06Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Author(s)=Ruth Parry; Marco Pino; Sharan Harris-Christensen
|Title=RealTalk resources for clinical trainers: Embedding naturalistic recordings and conversation analytic evidence into existing practice in communication training
|Editor(s)=Petra Sneijder; Annette Klarenbeek
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=ParryPinoHarris-Christensen2024
|Publisher=Palgrave MacMillan
|Year=2024
|Language=English
|Chapter=2
|Booktitle=Interventions in Health Care Interaction
|Pages=21-56
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-59551-6_2#DOI
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59551-6_2
|ISBN=978-3-031-59550-9
}}

ParryPinoHarris-Christensen2024

2024-07-19T09:34:17Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ruth Parry; Marco Pino; Sharan Harris-Christensen |Title=RealTalk resources for clinical trainers: Embedding naturalistic recordings and..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Ruth Parry; Marco Pino; Sharan Harris-Christensen
|Title=RealTalk resources for clinical trainers: Embedding naturalistic recordings and conversation analytic evidence into existing practice in communication training
|Editor(s)=Petra Sneijder; Annette Klarenbeek
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=ParryPinoHarris-Christensen2024
|Publisher=Palgrave MacMillan
|Year=2024
|Language=English
|Chapter=2
|Pages=21-56
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-59551-6_2#DOI
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59551-6_2
|ISBN=978-3-031-59550-9
}}

PinoFatiganteEtAl2021

2024-06-10T15:47:18Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Marilena Fatigante; Francesca Alby; Cristina Zucchermaglio;
|Title=Two Sources of Miscommunication in Oncology Consultations: An Observational Study Using Conversation Analysis
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Healthcare interaction; Oncology
|Key=PinoFatiganteEtAl2021
|Year=2022
|Language=English
|Journal=Applied Linguistics
|Volume=43
|Number=2
|Pages=249–270
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab036
|DOI=10.1093/applin/amab036
|Abstract=This article investigates miscommunication in sequences of talk where an oncologist asks about patients’ co-morbidities, that is, their other illnesses beyond cancer. Using conversation analysis, we examine ways in which the participants identify and manage two sources of miscommunication: a divergence in the doctor’s and the patient’s understandings about the scope of the question; and a divergence in the doctor’s and the patient’s (and sometimes their companion’s) understandings about the matters that the question targets. Our findings have implications for practice, highlighting ways in which clinicians and patients can manage these sources of miscommunication. These include practices to retrospectively or pre-emptively manage ambiguities and to check the accuracy of patients’ answers. Additionally, our study addresses some theoretical and methodological problems in the study of miscommunication. Our data consist of 25 video-recorded first consultations in an Italian hospital; the participants speak Italian.
}}

PinoLand2022

2024-06-10T15:24:25Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Victoria Land;
|Title=How companions speak on patients’ behalf without undermining their autonomy: Findings from a conversation analytic study of palliative care consultations
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical CA; Healthcare interaction; Palliative Care; End of life
|Key=PinoLand2022
|Year=2022
|Language=English
|Journal=Sociology of Health & Illness
|Volume=44
|Number=2
|Pages=395-415
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.13427
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13427
|Abstract=Companions are individuals who support patients and attend health-care appointments with them. Several studies characterised companions’ participation in broad terms, glossing over the details of how they time and design their actions, and how patients and health-care practitioners (HCPs) respond to them. This article aims to examine these aspects in detail by using conversation analysis, focusing on actions whereby companions speak on patients’ behalf—mentioning delicate aspects of patients’ experience (specifically, by alluding to patients’ thoughts or feelings about dying). Some studies suggested that these actions undermine patients’ autonomy. By contrast, through examination of palliative care consultations in a UK hospice, we found that these interventions are warranted by contextual circumstances: they are either invited by patients or HCPs (through questions or gaze) or volunteered to help with the progression of an activity (e.g. when a patient does not answer an HCP’s question). Additionally, all parties collaborate in constructing these companion interventions as temporary departures from an otherwise prevailing normative orientation to patients’ right to speak for themselves. The study contributes to the sociology of health and illness by characterising how companions contribute to the ways in which participants coordinate their relative rights and responsibilities, and ultimately their relationships, within health-care interactions.
}}

HoeyPino2023

2024-06-10T15:23:26Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Marco Pino;
|Title=Procedural detailing: A patient’s practice for normalizing routine behaviors
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Healthcare interaction; Palliative Care
|Key=HoeyPino2023
|Year=2023
|Language=English
|Journal=Health Communication
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10410236.2023.2211364
|DOI=10.1080/10410236.2023.2211364
|Abstract=In palliative care in the UK, occupational and/or physiotherapists consult with patients to assess how they are managing their activities for daily living in light of their life-limiting condition(s), and to identify any activities that might benefit from therapeutic intervention. In this paper we use conversation analysis to describe a patient’s practice in these consultations, which we call “procedural detailing,” whereby they produce a step-by-step description of how they do some everyday activity, such that it is depicted as adequate, stable, and unproblematic. Based on a collection of 15 cases identified in video recordings of consultations in a large English hospice, we demonstrate how patients use this practice to normalize their routine conduct and thereby reject or rule out an actual or anticipated therapeutic recommendation. Our analysis suggests that such descriptions let patients participate in shared decision-making by revealing their preference for routines that preserve their level of independence and dignity.
}}

PinoLandHoey2024

2024-06-10T15:11:22Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Victoria Land; Elliott Hoey;
|Title=Moving towards (and away from) possible discussions about dying: Emergent outcomes of companions’ actions in hospice consultations
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical CA; Healthcare interaction; Palliative Care; End of life
|Key=PinoLandHoey2024
|Year=2024
|Language=English
|Journal=Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality
|URL=https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v7i3.144611
|DOI=10.7146/si.v7i3.144611
|Abstract=The article examines a corpus of palliative care interactions recorded in a large UK hospice. It focuses on a collection of patient possible allusions to disease progression and end of life and examines their companions’ (i.e., accompanying family members and friends) subsequent actions. These actions implement various interactional projects that are coherent with the sequence of actions and broader activity underway. They share the outcome that they steer the interaction away from the possibility of immediately elaborating on the patient’s allusion, and of making matters related to disease progression or end of life explicit (despite these being relevant possibilities).
}}

PinoLandHoey2024

2024-05-01T13:06:43Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marco Pino; Victoria Land; Elliott Hoey; |Title=Moving towards (and away from) possible discussions about dying: Emergent outcomes of co..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Victoria Land; Elliott Hoey;
|Title=Moving towards (and away from) possible discussions about dying: Emergent outcomes of companions’ actions in hospice consultations
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=PinoLandHoey2024
|Year=2024
|Language=English
|Journal=Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality
|URL=https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v7i3.144611
|DOI=10.7146/si.v7i3.144611
|Abstract=The article examines a corpus of palliative care interactions recorded in a large UK hospice. It focuses on a collection of patient possible allusions to disease progression and end of life and examines their companions’ (i.e., accompanying family members and friends) subsequent actions. These actions implement various interactional projects that are coherent with the sequence of actions and broader activity underway. They share the outcome that they steer the interaction away from the possibility of immediately elaborating on the patient’s allusion, and of making matters related to disease progression or end of life explicit (despite these being relevant possibilities).
}}

PinoEdmonds2024

2024-04-03T10:04:26Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marco Pino; David Matthew Edmonds; |Title=Misgendering, cisgenderism and the reproduction of the gender order in social interaction |Tag..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; David Matthew Edmonds;
|Title=Misgendering, cisgenderism and the reproduction of the gender order in social interaction
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=PinoEdmonds2024
|Year=2024
|Language=English
|Journal=Sociology
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00380385241237194
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385241237194
|Abstract=This article investigates moments in social interaction where tacit processes of gender attribution become visible because they are temporarily disrupted and exposed through misgendering. Our data consist of publicly available audio and video-recorded cases of misgendering, mostly from UK and US contexts. Practices of misgendering embody assumptions that map people’s current gender onto their self-presentations and gender histories. Organisational features of social interaction facilitate the reproduction of these assumptions as taken-for-granted criteria for gender attribution. In the current climate of ‘gender panics’, the rise of a norm whereby people’s self-defined gender should be respected clashes against enduring assumptions that uphold a gender order grounded in cisgenderism. The exposure of gender assumptions in moments of misgendering presents a potential for social change, but this potential is also limited by practices that reproduce (rather than challenge) the dominant gender order.
}}

EdmondsPino2022

2024-02-14T14:25:31Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=David Matthew Edmonds; Marco Pino;
|Title=Designedly intentional misgendering in social interaction: A conversation analytic account
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=EdmondsPino2022
|Year=2023
|Language=English
|Journal=Feminism & Psychology
|Volume=33
|Number=4
|Pages=668-691
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09593535221141550
|DOI=10.1177/09593535221141550
|Abstract=Misgendering – moments where someone refers to, describes, or addresses a person as a gender different to the one they identify with – is a challenge that trans people can face in social interaction. Misgendering is an interactional phenomenon but has yet to be examined for how it unfolds in conversation. Utilizing conversation analysis, we focus on what we term designedly intentional misgendering. We show how speakers utilize turn-design features and sequential placement to mark a misgendering as intentional. We also document how such misgendering is mobilized for different actions in social interaction. Speakers can utilize designedly intentional misgendering to display negative interactional positions towards trans people and related matters. Trans people can respond to such misgendering by negatively characterizing another speaker and their conduct. Our work advances existing discussions around the intentionality of misgendering and trans people’s interactional agency.
}}

CAhealthcare2024

2023-10-24T11:57:05Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Training, Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop 'Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions'
|Short title=CA and healthcare
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
Loughborough University

Thursday 25th and Friday 26th January 2024
|Announcement text=Note: this is event is now full, and we are operating a waiting list.

Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Led by by Marco Pino and Ruth Parry and co-organised by Charles Antaki, Laura Jenkins, and Magnus Hamann

Loughborough University

Thursday 25th and Friday 26th January 2024

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (GMT) on the first day and 9am-4pm (GMT) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 18th of January 2024 (you will need to apply for this separately by contacting c.antaki@lboro.ac.uk).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £100
- For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £25
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

We will reserve extra places for applications from regions where there are fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 15th December 2023.
|Year=2024
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2024/01/25
|To date=2024/01/26
}}

CAhealthcare2024

2023-10-03T09:35:47Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Training, Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop 'Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions'
|Short title=CA and healthcare
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
Loughborough University

Thursday 25th and Friday 26th January 2024
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Led by by Marco Pino and Ruth Parry and co-organised by Charles Antaki, Laura Jenkins, and Magnus Hamann

Loughborough University

Thursday 25th and Friday 26th January 2024

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (GMT) on the first day and 9am-4pm (GMT) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 18th of January 2024 (you will need to apply for this separately by contacting c.antaki@lboro.ac.uk).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £100
- For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £25
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

We will reserve extra places for applications from regions where there are fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 15th December 2023.
|Year=2024
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2024/01/25
|To date=2024/01/26
}}

CAhealthcare2024

2023-09-05T11:31:47Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop 'Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions'
|Short title=CA and healthcare
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
Loughborough University

Thursday 25th and Friday 26th January 2024
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Led by by Marco Pino and Ruth Parry and co-organised by Charles Antaki, Laura Jenkins, and Magnus Hamann

Loughborough University

Thursday 25th and Friday 26th January 2024

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (GMT) on the first day and 9am-4pm (GMT) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 18th of January 2024 (you will need to apply for this separately by contacting c.antaki@lboro.ac.uk).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £100
- For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £25
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

We will reserve extra places for applications from regions where there are fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 15th December 2024.
|Year=2024
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2024/01/25
|To date=2024/01/26
}}

CAhealthcare2024

2023-09-05T11:31:13Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{Announcement |Announcement Type=Workshop |Full title=Online workshop 'Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions' |Short title=CA and healthcare |Short summary=Online..."

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop 'Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions'
|Short title=CA and healthcare
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactionsLoughborough University

Thursday 25th and Friday 26th January 2024
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Led by by Marco Pino and Ruth Parry and co-organised by Charles Antaki, Laura Jenkins, and Magnus Hamann
Loughborough University

Thursday 25th and Friday 26th January 2024

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (GMT) on the first day and 9am-4pm (GMT) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 18th of January 2024 (you will need to apply for this separately by contacting c.antaki@lboro.ac.uk).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £100
- For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £25
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

We will reserve extra places for applications from regions where there are fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 15th December 2024.
|Year=2024
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2024/01/25
|To date=2024/01/26
}}

PinoJenkins2023

2023-06-03T10:25:09Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marco Pino; Laura Jenkins; |Title=Inviting the patient to talk about a conversation they had with another healthcare practitioner: A way..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Laura Jenkins;
|Title=Inviting the patient to talk about a conversation they had with another healthcare practitioner: A way of promoting discussion about disease progression and end of life in palliative care interactions
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical CA; Healthcare interaction; End of life; Palliative care
|Key=PinoJenkins2023
|Year=2023
|Language=English
|Journal=Health Communication
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10410236.2023.2185579
|DOI=10.1080/10410236.2023.2185579
|Abstract=Discussing disease progression is a core task in palliative care. This is especially important when there are indications that a patient considers their death as less imminent than the clinical team does. This article examines a communicative action that palliative medicine doctors use to address such discrepancies in knowledge and understanding of the patient’s prognosis: inviting the patient to talk about the contents of a conversation they had with another healthcare practitioner. The study used conversation analysis to examine five consultations in which this action was identified. These were part of a larger data set of 37 consultations recorded in a large UK hospice and involving patients with palliative care needs, sometimes accompanied by family or friends, and palliative medicine doctors. Findings are that the action of inviting the patient to talk about a previous conversation creates an opportunity for patients to articulate what they know and understand about their disease progression – but without requiring them to do so. Discussing such sensitive matters is thus made a matter of ‘opting in’ (rather than ‘opting out’). Doctors thereby avoid being interactionally accountable for directly initiating a potentially distressing topic. The article shows how the task of discussing disease progression and end of life is intertwined with the delicate management of patients’ displayed states of awareness regarding their disease progression. The study thus has practical implications by documenting ways in which clinicians can help patients realign their expectations about such delicate matters.
}}

HoeyPino2023

2023-05-31T12:25:40Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Marco Pino; |Title=Procedural detailing: A patient’s practice for normalizing routine behaviors |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Ho..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Marco Pino;
|Title=Procedural detailing: A patient’s practice for normalizing routine behaviors
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=HoeyPino2023
|Year=2023
|Language=English
|Journal=Health Communication
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10410236.2023.2211364
|DOI=10.1080/10410236.2023.2211364
|Abstract=In palliative care in the UK, occupational and/or physiotherapists consult with patients to assess how they are managing their activities for daily living in light of their life-limiting condition(s), and to identify any activities that might benefit from therapeutic intervention. In this paper we use conversation analysis to describe a patient’s practice in these consultations, which we call “procedural detailing,” whereby they produce a step-by-step description of how they do some everyday activity, such that it is depicted as adequate, stable, and unproblematic. Based on a collection of 15 cases identified in video recordings of consultations in a large English hospice, we demonstrate how patients use this practice to normalize their routine conduct and thereby reject or rule out an actual or anticipated therapeutic recommendation. Our analysis suggests that such descriptions let patients participate in shared decision-making by revealing their preference for routines that preserve their level of independence and dignity.
}}

EdmondsPino2022

2023-01-12T16:40:29Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=David Matthew Edmonds; Marco Pino; |Title=Designedly intentional misgendering in social interaction: A conversation analytic account |Ta..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=David Matthew Edmonds; Marco Pino;
|Title=Designedly intentional misgendering in social interaction: A conversation analytic account
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=EdmondsPino2022
|Year=2023
|Language=English
|Journal=Feminism & Psychology
|Pages=1-24
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09593535221141550
|DOI=10.1177/09593535221141550
|Abstract=Misgendering – moments where someone refers to, describes, or addresses a person as a gender different to the one they identify with – is a challenge that trans people can face in social interaction. Misgendering is an interactional phenomenon but has yet to be examined for how it unfolds in conversation. Utilizing conversation analysis, we focus on what we term designedly intentional misgendering. We show how speakers utilize turn-design features and sequential placement to mark a misgendering as intentional. We also document how such misgendering is mobilized for different actions in social interaction. Speakers can utilize designedly intentional misgendering to display negative interactional positions towards trans people and related matters. Trans people can respond to such misgendering by negatively characterizing another speaker and their conduct. Our work advances existing discussions around the intentionality of misgendering and trans people’s interactional agency.
}}

Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

2022-10-21T09:51:36Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Short title=Workshop
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Announcement text=NOTE: this event is fully booked and we are operating a waiting list

Led by by Marco Pino and Ruth Parry and co-organised by Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Magnus Hamann, and Jessica Robles
Loughborough University

Thursday 26th and Friday 27th January 2023

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (GMT) on the first day and 9am-4pm (GMT) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 19th of January 2023 (you will need to apply for this separately by contacting c.antaki@lboro.ac.uk).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:

For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £100

For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £25

Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation

We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

TO APPLY:

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

We will reserve extra places for applications from regions where there are fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 16th December 2023.
|Year=2023
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2023/01/26
|To date=2023/01/27
|Submission deadline=2022/12/16
}}

Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

2022-10-04T13:36:38Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Short title=Workshop
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Announcement text=Led by by Marco Pino and Ruth Parry and co-organised by Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Magnus Hamann, and Jessica Robles
Loughborough University

Thursday 26th and Friday 27th January 2023

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (GMT) on the first day and 9am-4pm (GMT) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 19th of January 2023 (you will need to apply for this separately by contacting c.antaki@lboro.ac.uk).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:

For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £100

For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £25

Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation

We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

TO APPLY:

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

We will reserve extra places for applications from regions where there are fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 16th December 2023.
|Year=2023
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2023/01/26
|To date=2023/01/27
|Submission deadline=2022/12/16
}}

Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

2022-10-04T13:36:00Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Short title=Workshop
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Announcement text=Led by by Marco Pino and Ruth Parry and co-organised by Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Magnus Hamann, and Jessica Robles
Loughborough University

Thursday 26th and Friday 27th January 2023

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (GMT) on the first day and 9am-4pm (GMT) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 19th of January 2023 (you will need to apply for this separately by contacting c.antaki@lboro.ac.uk).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:

For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £100

For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £25

Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation

We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

We will reserve extra places for applications from regions where there are fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 16th December 2023.
|Year=2023
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2023/01/26
|To date=2023/01/27
|Submission deadline=2022/12/16
}}

Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

2022-10-04T12:54:26Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{Announcement |Announcement Type=Workshop |Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions |Short title=Workshop |Short summary=Online worksho..."

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Short title=Workshop
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Announcement text=Led by by Marco Pino and Ruth Parry and co-organised by Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Magnus Hamann, and Jessica Robles
Loughborough University

Thursday 26th and Friday 27th January 2023

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (GMT) on the first day and 9am-4pm (GMT) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators. We will ask participants to complete a short activity in their own time after the end of the first workshop day.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers, practitioners, and faculty who have some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 19th of January 2023 (you will need to apply for this separately by contacting c.antaki@lboro.ac.uk).

The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics, practitioners, and PhD students with training budgets: £100
- For unwaged academics, practitioners, and PhD students without training budgets: £25
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research or practice.

We will reserve extra places for applications from regions where there are fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 16th December 2023.
|Year=2023
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2023/01/26
|To date=2023/01/27
|Submission deadline=2022/12/16
}}

ParryEtAl2022

2022-09-01T08:20:57Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ruth Parry; Becky Whittaker; Marco Pino; Laura Jenkins; Esme Worthington; Christina Faull; |Title=RealTalk evidence‑based communicatio..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Ruth Parry; Becky Whittaker; Marco Pino; Laura Jenkins; Esme Worthington; Christina Faull;
|Title=RealTalk evidence‑based communication training resources: Development of conversation analysis‑based materials to support training in end‑of‑life‑related health and social care conversations
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=ParryEtAl2022
|Year=2022
|Language=English
|Journal=BMC Medical Education
|Volume=22
|Number=637
|Pages=1-9
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03641-y
|DOI=10.1186/s12909-022-03641-y
|Abstract=Training to enhance healthcare practitioners’ capabilities in engaging people in sensitive and end-of life-related conversations is in demand. However, evaluations have either not measured, or found very limited impact on actual practice and patient experience. Training effectiveness is improved when it is based on in-depth evidence, reflects the complexity of real-life interactions, and instils principles adaptable to everyday practice. A relatively new source of in-depth evidence and practice-relevant insights on healthcare interactions is conversation analytic research, a form of observational analysis of real-life interactions. However, conversation analytic research findings have largely been disseminated by and for scientists, rather than clinicians and trainers. We used conversation analytic evidence to develop resources for use by healthcare trainers. The aim was to increase training’s evidence-base and authenticity. We further aimed to develop resources applicable to working with learners ranging from novices to advanced practitioners.
Methods: Using an intervention development approach, we created online video-clips and supplementary written materials for professionals who deliver training, supervision, and support in healthcare communication for staff and students. The materials were reviewed by an advisory group comprising clinicians, lay consultees, educators, and researchers, and piloted by trainers in UK universities, NHS organisations and independent hospices. We refined materials based on their feedback.
Results: The resulting ‘RealTalk’ resources focus on practices for communicating with patients and their companions about end-of-life and prognosis. Two core training modules were developed, each comprising several patient case studies featuring video-clips from real-life healthcare consultations. The clips featured practices that patients and experienced practitioners use in approaching end-of-life matters. The case studies also included evidence-based descriptions of observable practices and the principles underlying these, alongside transcripts and case synopses.
Conclusions: RealTalk training resources aim to facilitate evidence-based, experiential and reflective learning, focusing on communication challenges, practices and principles for end-of-life-related interactions. The resources are designed for use by trainers for delivering all levels of training, from introductory to advanced, in both formal and informal training settings. Our development process may serve as a blueprint for the production of future evidence-based training resources based on conversation analytic research.
}}

Pino2022

2022-08-18T14:59:11Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marco Pino; |Title=Hurting and blaming: Two components in the action formation of complaints about absent parties |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Pin..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino;
|Title=Hurting and blaming: Two components in the action formation of complaints about absent parties
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=Pino2022
|Year=2022
|Language=English
|Journal=Research On Language and Social Interaction
|Volume=55
|Number=3
|Pages=260-278
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2022.2101298
|Abstract=This article investigates the action formation of complaints about absent parties—asking what makes them recognizable as such. It shows that recipient responses display their understanding that complaints comprise two components: a display of hurt (related to the impact of the complained-of events) and a blaming (attributing responsibility to an absent party). The setting, a bereavement support group in the UK, is perspicuous for this investigation because the group facilitators respond to the clients’ complaints by decoupling their constituent components, validating the hurt while avoiding affiliating with the blaming embodied in them. This makes visible these complaint-recipients’ distinctive orientations to the two components of complaints. The article advances understandings of the action formation of complaints; it documents practices whereby service providers can show compassion toward the hurt embodied in clients’ complaints; and it shows how principles of bereavement support are implemented in face-to-face interactions. The participants speak British English.
}}

PinoLand2022

2022-07-24T16:53:01Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marco Pino; Victoria Land; |Title=How companions speak on patients’ behalf without undermining their autonomy: Findings from a convers..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Victoria Land;
|Title=How companions speak on patients’ behalf without undermining their autonomy: Findings from a conversation analytic study of palliative care consultations
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=PinoLand2022
|Year=2022
|Language=English
|Journal=Sociology of Health & Illness
|Volume=44
|Number=2
|Pages=395-415
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.13427
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13427
|Abstract=Companions are individuals who support patients and attend health-care appointments with them. Several studies characterised companions’ participation in broad terms, glossing over the details of how they time and design their actions, and how patients and health-care practitioners (HCPs) respond to them. This article aims to examine these aspects in detail by using conversation analysis, focusing on actions whereby companions speak on patients’ behalf—mentioning delicate aspects of patients’ experience (specifically, by alluding to patients’ thoughts or feelings about dying). Some studies suggested that these actions undermine patients’ autonomy. By contrast, through examination of palliative care consultations in a UK hospice, we found that these interventions are warranted by contextual circumstances: they are either invited by patients or HCPs (through questions or gaze) or volunteered to help with the progression of an activity (e.g. when a patient does not answer an HCP’s question). Additionally, all parties collaborate in constructing these companion interventions as temporary departures from an otherwise prevailing normative orientation to patients’ right to speak for themselves. The study contributes to the sociology of health and illness by characterising how companions contribute to the ways in which participants coordinate their relative rights and responsibilities, and ultimately their relationships, within health-care interactions.
}}

PinoFatiganteEtAl2021

2022-02-11T09:58:11Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marco Pino; Marilena Fatigante; Francesca Alby; Cristina Zucchermaglio; |Title=Two Sources of Miscommunication in Oncology Consultations..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Marilena Fatigante; Francesca Alby; Cristina Zucchermaglio;
|Title=Two Sources of Miscommunication in Oncology Consultations: An Observational Study Using Conversation Analysis
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA
|Key=PinoFatiganteEtAl2021
|Year=2021
|Language=English
|Journal=Applied Linguistics
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab036
|DOI=10.1093/applin/amab036
|Abstract=This article investigates miscommunication in sequences of talk where an oncologist asks about patients’ co-morbidities, that is, their other illnesses beyond cancer. Using conversation analysis, we examine ways in which the participants identify and manage two sources of miscommunication: a divergence in the doctor’s and the patient’s understandings about the scope of the question; and a divergence in the doctor’s and the patient’s (and sometimes their companion’s) understandings about the matters that the question targets. Our findings have implications for practice, highlighting ways in which clinicians and patients can manage these sources of miscommunication. These include practices to retrospectively or pre-emptively manage ambiguities and to check the accuracy of patients’ answers. Additionally, our study addresses some theoretical and methodological problems in the study of miscommunication. Our data consist of 25 video-recorded first consultations in an Italian hospital; the participants speak Italian.
}}

EkbergParryEtAl2021

2021-12-10T09:30:35Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Stuart Ekberg; Ruth Parry; Victoria Land; Katie Ekberg; Marco Pino; Charles Antaki; Laura Jenkins; Becky Whittaker; |Title=Communicating..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Stuart Ekberg; Ruth Parry; Victoria Land; Katie Ekberg; Marco Pino; Charles Antaki; Laura Jenkins; Becky Whittaker;
|Title=Communicating with patients and families about illness progression and end of life: a review of studies using direct observation of clinical practice
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=EkbergParryEtAl2021
|Year=2021
|Language=English
|Journal=BMC Palliative Care
|Volume=20
|Number=186
|Pages=1-12
|URL=https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12904-021-00876-2.pdf
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00876-2
|Abstract=Background: There is growing recognition that a diverse range of healthcare professionals need competence in palliative approaches to care; effective communication is a core component of such practice. This article informs evidence-based communication about illness progression and end of life through a rapid review of studies that directly observe how experienced clinicians manage such discussions. Methods: The current rapid review updates findings of the 2014 systematic review focussing more specifically on evidence related to illness progression and end-oflife conversations. Literature searches were conducted in nine bibliographic databases. Studies using conversation analysis or discourse analysis to examine recordings of actual conversations about illness progression or end of life were eligible for inclusion in the review. An aggregative approach was used to synthesise the findings of included studies. Results: Following screening, 26 sources were deemed to meet eligibility criteria. Synthesis of study findings identified the structure and functioning of ten communication practices used in illness progression and end-of-life discussions. Conclusion: The ten practices identified underpin five evidence-based recommendations for communicating with patients or family members about illness progression and end of life.
}}

Pino2020

2021-12-10T09:26:01Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino;
|Title=Challenging generalisations: Leveraging the power of individuality in support group interactions
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=Pino2020
|Year=2021
|Language=English
|Journal=Language in Society
|Volume=50
|Number=5
|Pages=695–722
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/challenging-generalisations-leveraging-the-power-of-individuality-in-support-group-interactions/EDCF17D6DDBE825686F44142A3C9AE2F
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404520000603
|Abstract=Explicit generalisations are statements that attribute a characteristic to all members of a social category (e.g. drug users). This article examines the tensions and negotiations that the use of generalisations prompts within support group interactions. Generalisations are practices for the cautious implementation of delicate actions. They can be used to convey perspectives on group members’ experiences by implication (without commenting on them directly), by virtue of those members belonging to the category to which a generalisation applies. At the same time, generalisations can misrepresent some individual cases within that category. Using conversation analysis, the article investigates how generalisations are deployed, challenged, and then defended in support group interactions. These analyses identify a tension between utilising the sense-making resources that category memberships afford, and the protection of its members from unwelcome generalisations.Data consist of recorded support-groupmeetings for people recovering from drug addiction (in Italy) and for bereaved people (in the UK).
}}

JenkinsParryPino2021

2021-12-10T09:25:24Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Laura Jenkins; Ruth Parry; Marco Pino;
|Title=Providing Opportunities for Patients to Say More about Their Pain without Overtly Asking: A Conversation Analysis of Doctors Repeating Patient Answers in Palliative Care Pain Assessment
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=JenkinsParryPino2021
|Year=2021
|Language=English
|Journal=Applied Linguistics
|Volume=42
|Number=5
|Pages=990–1013
|URL=https://watermark.silverchair.com/amaa062.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAArwwggK4BgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggKpMIICpQIBADCCAp4GCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMxinI3DVIcTVg5qBrAgEQgIICb2vMgQaNx1rtNHe3512b1IVjrN7zz4Pi9hQtSXVbB4DuMReV_TKBqZjDx7QOCUnKjaR2QeDGJ79wFYx5-41FJ5m4hWYVTkdNGdwVK8FVaMOkECfp4jl5-lj4thsx17wAUpPJdnL7KXST38ia9_7lOj6JbB-vahbaS6VH9S6exPTj1W1HbUoCVz7e8Aiifq7r6-d-eyqNIRpHuN3x-QGvAduJ2FxPifgUFr7g83bf0-m-cvxRz2OfoKO1BMOAU_9tP6fWo5Rnn6g12B2g8bZA7eUzGTjgy5bw3OUVEMUdd-vmePumWenisVmD1E9zlws9DQt7xdTWc-6BfxW-vk2On6-H8G0f86n4fIQmGRzWrOULaM-c6-VXjrUG9InzC8OIDqrCyo8YU4StcTVhQGLd4MwysZBhZgZR-9DIET7MduH_Nk7fQo6CuT_mxvo3yM4yyuNiOGMFPVpxoM1HHw2ZllOZy5ntzyoczGMA9d7MjDgGte7wOtKrTeQjrQyLs-bHnU6wuCViN-YVyDdsVR0SzwTb6V0bilr4mVZxbgNEJCRKieCLVnESq8Rkfj1LpvxdS33HsX7skBr-ewmCjcC62JaRlaRTCLec_EK0EM-WubmfA63dRhDtBSVY4i3-VFQBsVb0ea_lt_Q_KwFSvmyeB1l9XnlDC2tLtCpHLGREdMQzwph1Fgb4k_O2wEb2RgQu7diq9wdkYJm653EbfoKWJ36eMUhyr_4mJaunICqN8AuZ7qMJjyPiWSMfRN6zo0dngHadXY-vOaBrmznksLOLow7NEqEdY1Y-AH3jyx1sCL6wINDy_kpasVGFxxRQ0wQr
|DOI=10.1093/applin/amaa062
|Abstract=As the main symptom in palliative care, pain requires careful assessment. Repeating patient answers is one recommended communication technique for helping convey to patients that they have been heard, and to encourage them to say more. We examined 23 episodes where experienced doctors repeat patients’ answers with mirrored rhythm and downward-final intonation, captured in pain assessments video-recorded in 37 consultations in a large UK hospice. Using conversation analysis, our aim was to determine whether or not the repeats invite additional talk, and if so, how they do so. Our findings reveal lexical and prosodic features of doctors’ repeated pain answers that signal completion of the sequence. At the same time, because the patient has greater epistemic access to their own pain, a repeat can also invite confirmation or disconfirmation. The patients in our data sometimes—but not always—respond to the repeat with confirmation or further talk. We conclude that repeating patient answers with mirrored rhythm and downward-final intonation provides a no-obligation opportunity for patient-led confirmation, disconfirmation, or expansion of pain descriptions, particularly when the pain matter is new, revised, or has been problematic to report.
}}

LboroCA&healthcare2021b

2021-07-14T09:06:01Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Short title=CA&healthcare
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

@saul, @rolsi_journal, @CACEnotes, @Marco_Pino_, and @DoctorJRo
Loughborough University

Monday 6th and Tuesday 7th September 2021

Contact: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Ruth Parry, Marco Pino, and Jessica Robles
Loughborough University

Monday 6th and Tuesday 7th September 2021

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (BST) on the first day and 9am-4pm (BST) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers and faculty who have at least some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics and PhD students with training budgets: £100
- For unwaged academics and PhD students without training budgets: £25
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research. Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 3rd of September 2021 (you will need to apply for it separately).

We will reserve extra places for applications from areas with fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).
|Year=2021
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2021/09/06
|To date=2021/09/07
}}

LboroCA&healthcare2021b

2021-07-14T08:55:31Z

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Short title=CA&healthcare
|Short summary=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Ruth Parry, Marco Pino, and Jessica Robles
Loughborough University

Monday 6th and Tuesday 7th September 2021

Contact: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Ruth Parry, Marco Pino, and Jessica Robles
Loughborough University

Monday 6th and Tuesday 7th September 2021

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm (BST) on the first day and 9am-4pm (BST) on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers and faculty who have at least some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). The number of participants will be restricted to 20 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed academics and PhD students with training budgets: £100
- For unwaged academics and PhD students without training budgets: £25
- Commercial applicants: please get in touch with us to discuss your participation
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research. Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for the 3rd of September 2021 (you will need to apply for it separately).

We will reserve extra places for applications from areas with fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 20th August 2021.
|Year=2021
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2021/09/06
|To date=2021/09/07
}}

JenkinsParryPino2021

2021-03-12T14:57:07Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Laura Jenkins; Ruth Parry; Marco Pino; |Title=Providing Opportunities for Patients to Say More about Their Pain without Overtly Asking:..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Laura Jenkins; Ruth Parry; Marco Pino;
|Title=Providing Opportunities for Patients to Say More about Their Pain without Overtly Asking: A Conversation Analysis of Doctors Repeating Patient Answers in Palliative Care Pain Assessment
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=JenkinsParryPino2021
|Year=2021
|Language=English
|Journal=Applied Linguistics
|URL=https://watermark.silverchair.com/amaa062.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAArwwggK4BgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggKpMIICpQIBADCCAp4GCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMxinI3DVIcTVg5qBrAgEQgIICb2vMgQaNx1rtNHe3512b1IVjrN7zz4Pi9hQtSXVbB4DuMReV_TKBqZjDx7QOCUnKjaR2QeDGJ79wFYx5-41FJ5m4hWYVTkdNGdwVK8FVaMOkECfp4jl5-lj4thsx17wAUpPJdnL7KXST38ia9_7lOj6JbB-vahbaS6VH9S6exPTj1W1HbUoCVz7e8Aiifq7r6-d-eyqNIRpHuN3x-QGvAduJ2FxPifgUFr7g83bf0-m-cvxRz2OfoKO1BMOAU_9tP6fWo5Rnn6g12B2g8bZA7eUzGTjgy5bw3OUVEMUdd-vmePumWenisVmD1E9zlws9DQt7xdTWc-6BfxW-vk2On6-H8G0f86n4fIQmGRzWrOULaM-c6-VXjrUG9InzC8OIDqrCyo8YU4StcTVhQGLd4MwysZBhZgZR-9DIET7MduH_Nk7fQo6CuT_mxvo3yM4yyuNiOGMFPVpxoM1HHw2ZllOZy5ntzyoczGMA9d7MjDgGte7wOtKrTeQjrQyLs-bHnU6wuCViN-YVyDdsVR0SzwTb6V0bilr4mVZxbgNEJCRKieCLVnESq8Rkfj1LpvxdS33HsX7skBr-ewmCjcC62JaRlaRTCLec_EK0EM-WubmfA63dRhDtBSVY4i3-VFQBsVb0ea_lt_Q_KwFSvmyeB1l9XnlDC2tLtCpHLGREdMQzwph1Fgb4k_O2wEb2RgQu7diq9wdkYJm653EbfoKWJ36eMUhyr_4mJaunICqN8AuZ7qMJjyPiWSMfRN6zo0dngHadXY-vOaBrmznksLOLow7NEqEdY1Y-AH3jyx1sCL6wINDy_kpasVGFxxRQ0wQr
|DOI=10.1093/applin/amaa062
|Abstract=As the main symptom in palliative care, pain requires careful assessment. Repeating patient answers is one recommended communication technique for helping convey to patients that they have been heard, and to encourage them to say more. We examined 23 episodes where experienced doctors repeat patients’ answers with mirrored rhythm and downward-final intonation, captured in pain assessments video-recorded in 37 consultations in a large UK hospice. Using conversation analysis, our aim was to determine whether or not the repeats invite additional talk, and if so, how they do so. Our findings reveal lexical and prosodic features of doctors’ repeated pain answers that signal completion of the sequence. At the same time, because the patient has greater epistemic access to their own pain, a repeat can also invite confirmation or disconfirmation. The patients in our data sometimes—but not always—respond to the repeat with confirmation or further talk. We conclude that repeating patient answers with mirrored rhythm and downward-final intonation provides a no-obligation opportunity for patient-led confirmation, disconfirmation, or expansion of pain descriptions, particularly when the pain matter is new, revised, or has been problematic to report.
}}

Clift-Pino2020

2021-01-06T21:06:20Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rebecca Clift; Marco Pino; |Title=Turning the Tables: Objecting to Conduct in Conflict Talk |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Clift-Pino2020 |Year=2020..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Rebecca Clift; Marco Pino;
|Title=Turning the Tables: Objecting to Conduct in Conflict Talk
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=Clift-Pino2020
|Year=2020
|Language=English
|Journal=Research on Language & Social Interaction
|Volume=53
|Number=4
|Pages=463-480
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1826765
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2020.1826765
|Abstract=This article is a Conversation Analytic study of occasions where a speaker formulates what a recipient is doing as something objectionable, thereby delivering an accusation, e.g., “Why you shouting” or “I dunno why you’re being so aggressive.” We call these lexical formulations of what someone has just done conduct formulations. These are: (a) responsive to an ongoing imputation of
misconduct or misdemeanor, and (b) produced in response to an upgrade on prior attempts by the recipient to engage the producer of the conduct formulation in aligning with their project. The speaker thereby “turns the tables” on the recipient, challenging the legitimacy of, and thus rendering accountable, his line of action. The response by the recipient involves a downgrade of her prior action and so proposes resetting the terms of engagement on a more conciliatory basis. Data are in English and Italian.
}}

PinoDoehringParry2021

2020-09-22T14:42:40Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Ann Doehring; Ruth Parry
|Title=Practitioners’ Dilemmas and Strategies in Decision-making Conversations Where Patients and Companions Take Divergent Positions on a Healthcare Measure: An Observational Study Using Conversation Analysis
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=PinoDoehringParry2020
|Year=2020
|Language=English
|Journal=Health Communication
|URL=https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/journal_contribution/Practitioners_dilemmas_and_strategies_in_decision-making_conversations_where_patients_and_companions_take_divergent_positions_on_a_healthcare_measure_An_observational_study_using_conversation_analysis/12833999
|DOI=10.1080/10410236.2020.1813952
|Abstract=The presence of companions adds complexity to healthcare interactions. Few studies have characterized challenges arising when interactions involve healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients, and companions, or how those challenges are managed. Using conversation analysis, we examined recorded episodes where patients and companions adopt divergent positions on healthcare measures (e.g., walking aids, homecare, medications). We found nine such episodes within a dataset of 37 palliative care consultations with 37 patients, their companions, and ten healthcare practitioners (HCPs) – doctors, physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Palliative care is one of several healthcare domains where companions substantially contribute to care, consultations, and decision making. We propose that, when patients and companions adopt divergent positions, HCPs face a dilemma of affiliation’ wherein taking a position on the healthcare measure (e.g., recommending it) entails siding with one party, against the other. By examining what happens in the face of patient-companion divergence, we characterize HCPs’ strategies and substantiate our proposal that these reflect an underlying dilemma. We show that: HCPs do not immediately take a position on the healthcare measure after patient-companion divergence emerges; and when HCPs take a position later in the consultation, they do so without ostensibly siding with the party who previously supported the healthcare measure. Further, once an HCP takes a position, the party who supports the measure can treat the HCP as an ally. We offer insights and propose implications for: palliative care; the interactional complexities of healthcare decision-making; and consultations in which companions participate.
}}

PinoDoehringParry2021

2020-09-22T14:41:26Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marco Pino; Ann Doehring; Ruth Parry |Title=Practitioners’ Dilemmas and Strategies in Decision-making Conversations Where Patients and..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Ann Doehring; Ruth Parry
|Title=Practitioners’ Dilemmas and Strategies in Decision-making Conversations Where Patients and Companions Take Divergent Positions on a Healthcare Measure: An Observational Study Using Conversation Analysis
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=PinoDoehringParry2020
|Year=2020
|Language=English
|Journal=Health Communication
|URL=https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/journal_contribution/Practitioners_dilemmas_and_strategies_in_decision-making_conversations_where_patients_and_companions_take_divergent_positions_on_a_healthcare_measure_An_observational_study_using_conversation_analysis/12833999
|DOI=10.1080/10410236.2020.1813952
|Abstract=The presence of companions adds complexity to healthcare interactions. Few studies have characterized
challenges arising when interactions involve healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients, and companions,
or how those challenges are managed. Using conversation analysis, we examined recorded episodes
where patients and companions adopt divergent positions on healthcare measures (e.g., walking aids,
homecare, medications). We found nine such episodes within a dataset of 37 palliative care consultations
with 37 patients, their companions, and ten healthcare practitioners (HCPs) – doctors, physiotherapists
and occupational therapists. Palliative care is one of several healthcare domains where companions
substantially contribute to care, consultations, and decision making. We propose that, when patients
and companions adopt divergent positions, HCPs face a ‘dilemma of affiliation’ wherein taking a position
on the healthcare measure (e.g., recommending it) entails siding with one party, against the other. By
examining what happens in the face of patient-companion divergence, we characterize HCPs’ strategies
and substantiate our proposal that these reflect an underlying dilemma. We show that: HCPs do not
immediately take a position on the healthcare measure after patient-companion divergence emerges; and
when HCPs take a position later in the consultation, they do so without ostensibly siding with the party
who previously supported the healthcare measure. Further, once an HCP takes a position, the party who
supports the measure can treat the HCP as an ally. We offer insights and propose implications for:
palliative care; the interactional complexities of healthcare decision-making; and consultations in which
companions participate.
}}

CA & healthcare interactions workshop - Loughborough University 2021

2020-09-21T08:14:55Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Short title=CA & healthcare
|Short summary=A two-day online workshop on using conversation analysis to examine healthcare interactions. 4-5 February 2021.
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Ruth Parry, and Marco Pino
Loughborough University

Thursday 4th/ Friday 5th February 2021

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm on the first day and 9am-4pm on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers and faculty who have at least some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). The number of participants will be restricted to 10 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed persons and PhD students with training budgets: £50
- For unwaged people and PhD students without training budgets: £25
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research. Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for 28th of January 2021 (you will need to apply for it separately).

We will reserve extra places for applications from areas with fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

We are receiving a large number of applications. We will put future applicants on a waiting list and confirm places within the next few weeks.
|Year=2021
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2021/02/04
|To date=2021/02/05
}}

CA & healthcare interactions workshop - Loughborough University 2021

2020-09-17T15:41:29Z

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions
|Short title=CA & healthcare
|Short summary=A two-day online workshop on using conversation analysis to examine healthcare interactions. 4-5 February 2021.
|Announcement text=Online workshop in conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Ruth Parry, and Marco Pino
Loughborough University

Thursday 4th/ Friday 5th February 2021

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 3.30pm on the first day and 9am-4pm on the second day. It will be delivered online using Microsoft Teams.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers and faculty who have at least some familiarity with CA as a research methodology (including CA transcription conventions). The number of participants will be restricted to 10 in order to maximise opportunities for participation in the online environment.

Registration fee:
- For employed persons and PhD students with training budgets: £50
- For unwaged people and PhD students without training budgets: £25
We encourage potential attenders who are unwaged or otherwise less able to afford the registration
to contact the organisers as fees are negotiable in some circumstances.

To apply

Please send an email to m.pino@lboro.ac.uk introducing yourself and telling us about your existing knowledge of CA and your plans for using CA in your own research. Note: if are not already familiar with CA and want to attend this workshop, we recommend that you first attend our workshop ‘CA for beginners’, scheduled for 28th of January 2021 (you will need to apply for it separately).

We will reserve extra places for applications from areas with fewer EMCA training opportunities (see http://emcawiki.net/Where_to_study_EMCA).

Deadline for applications: 30th November 2020.
|Year=2021
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2021/02/04
|To date=2021/02/05
}}

Pino2020

2020-08-21T12:20:18Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Pino Marco
|Title=Challenging generalisations: Leveraging the power of individuality in support group interactions
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=Pino2020
|Year=2020
|Language=English
|Journal=Language in Society
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/challenging-generalisations-leveraging-the-power-of-individuality-in-support-group-interactions/EDCF17D6DDBE825686F44142A3C9AE2F
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404520000603
|Abstract=Explicit generalisations are statements that attribute a characteristic to all members of a social category (e.g. drug users). This article examines the tensions and negotiations that the use of generalisations prompts within support group interactions. Generalisations are practices for the cautious implementation of delicate actions. They can be used to convey perspectives on group members’ experiences by implication (without commenting on them directly), by virtue of those members belonging to the category to which a generalisation applies. At the same time, generalisations can misrepresent some individual cases within that category. Using conversation analysis, the article investigates how generalisations are deployed, challenged, and then defended in support group interactions. These analyses identify a tension between utilising the sense-making resources that category memberships afford, and the protection of its members from unwelcome generalisations.Data consist of recorded support-groupmeetings for people recovering from drug addiction (in Italy) and for bereaved people (in the UK).
}}

Pino2020

2020-08-21T11:09:30Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Title=Challenging generalisations: Leveraging the power of individuality in support group interactions |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Pino2020 |Year=2020 |Lan..."

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Title=Challenging generalisations: Leveraging the power of individuality in support group interactions
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=Pino2020
|Year=2020
|Language=English
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/challenging-generalisations-leveraging-the-power-of-individuality-in-support-group-interactions/EDCF17D6DDBE825686F44142A3C9AE2F
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404520000603
|Abstract=Explicit generalisations are statements that attribute a characteristic to all members of a social category (e.g. drug users). This article examines the tensions and negotiations that the use of generalisations prompts within support group interactions. Generalisations are practices for the cautious implementation of delicate actions. They can be used to convey perspectives on group members’ experiences by implication (without commenting on them directly), by virtue of those members belonging to the category to which a generalisation applies. At the same time, generalisations can misrepresent some individual cases within that category. Using conversation analysis, the article investigates how generalisations are deployed, challenged, and then defended in support group interactions. These analyses identify a tension between utilising the sense-making resources that category memberships afford, and the protection of its members from unwelcome generalisations.Data consist of recorded support-groupmeetings for people recovering from drug addiction (in Italy) and for bereaved people (in the UK).
}}

LboroPhD2020

2020-02-03T08:22:00Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{Announcement |Announcement Type=Job |Full title=LboroPhD2020 |Short title=Loughborough PhD |Short summary=We are advertising an ESRC DTP Collaborative PhD studentship. The s..."

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Job
|Full title=LboroPhD2020
|Short title=Loughborough PhD
|Short summary=We are advertising an ESRC DTP Collaborative PhD studentship. The student will work with Ruth Parry and myself on communication in end of life care, using conversation analysis. The advert is here:
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/mgsdtp/collaborativeandjoint/pa
|Announcement text=We are advertising an ESRC DTP Collaborative PhD studentship. The student will work with Ruth Parry and myself on communication in end of life care, using conversation analysis. The advert is here:
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/mgsdtp/collaborativeandjoint/parry_loughborough_-_collab_advert_2020.pdf
|Year=2020
|Web link=https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/mgsdtp/collaborativeandjoint/parry_loughborough_-_collab_advert_2020.pdf
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|To date=2020/03/02
|Address=Loughborough University, UK
}}

CA and Healthcare 2020 Training Workshop

2019-12-07T15:55:02Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{Announcement |Announcement Type=Workshop |Full title=Workshop 'Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions' - Loughborough University (UK) - 30th-31st January 2020 |Sh..."

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Workshop 'Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions' - Loughborough University (UK) - 30th-31st January 2020
|Short title=CA & healthcare
|Short summary=Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions - Loughborough University (UK) - 30th-31st January 2020: https://store.lboro.ac.uk/short-courses/communication-and-media/conversation-analysis/conversation-analysis-and-healthcare-interactions
|Announcement text=Conversation analysis and healthcare interactions

Marco Pino and Ruth Parry

Thursday 30th/Friday 31st January 2020

Conversation analysis (CA) is used increasingly in the scientific study of diverse health care and medical interactions, ranging from primary to secondary and tertiary care settings. CA has been used to examine numerous activities, from how patients introduce their problems to the ways in which medical decisions are negotiated and communicated. CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The workshop will provide an overview of the application of CA to healthcare interactions, including interactions between medical doctors, patients, and (on occasions) family members, and interactions with other healthcare professionals. The workshop will include in-depth information and practical work on CA’s methodology (including transcription and data analysis) and examination of some key findings of CA research in healthcare. The workshop aims to enable learning and enhancement of participants’ skills in CA’s methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This 2-day workshop will run from 10am to 5pm on the first day and 9am-4pm on the second day.

Short presentations by the facilitators (Marco Pino and Ruth Parry) will cover fundamental aspects of CA and its applications to the study of healthcare interactions. However, workshop time will largely be dedicated to practical sessions and small-group assignments focusing on original data (provided by the facilitators) in a range of healthcare settings. There will be a strong emphasis on hands-on experience of working with data alongside feedback from and discussion with facilitators.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to all postgraduates, post-docs, researchers and faculty. The number of participants will be restricted to 20 (in order to maximise opportunities for participation). A nominal charge will cover costs, including photocopies of training materials, refreshments and buffet lunches (not accommodation). For employed persons and PhD students with training budgets the charge is £120. For unwaged and PhD students without training budgets the charge is £60.

Places will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis.

Do I need to have prior knowledge of conversation analysis?

No. This workshop is open to participants who do not have prior knowledge of CA.

To register:

Please follow this link: https://store.lboro.ac.uk/short-courses/communication-and-media/conversation-analysis/conversation-analysis-and-healthcare-interactions

Enquiries to Marco Pino: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk
|Year=2020
|Web link=https://store.lboro.ac.uk/short-courses/communication-and-media/conversation-analysis/conversation-analysis-and-healthcare-interactions
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2020/01/30
|To date=2020/01/31
|Address=Loughborough University, UK
}}

Land-etal2018

2019-05-31T09:40:35Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Victoria Land; Ruth Parry; Marco Pino; Laura Jenkins; Luke Feathers; Christina Faull
|Title=Addressing possible problems with patients’ expectations, plans and decisions for the future: one strategy used by experienced clinicians in advance care planning conversations
|Tag(s)=EMCA; In press; Advanced care planning; Decision making; End of life; Palliative care; Managing patient expectations; Contingency planning
|Key=Land-etal2018
|Year=2019
|Language=English
|Journal=Patient Education and Counseling
|Volume=102
|Number=4
|Pages=670-679
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399118309996
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.008
|Abstract=Objective
Giving terminally ill people opportunities to participate in advance care planning involves tensions between: endorsing and supporting patients’ expectations, plans and decisions, and addressing how realistic these are. The latter risks exerting undue pressure to change plans; undermining autonomy; jeopardising therapeutic relationships. Our objective is to describe how experienced hospice doctors raise potential/actual problems with patients’ expectations, plans or decisions.

Methods
Conversation analysis of video-recorded consultations between five UK hospice consultants, 37 patients and their companions.

Results
Eleven episodes involving five doctors were found. In all of these we identified a ‘Hypothetical Scenario Sequence’ where doctors raise a hypothetical future scenario wherein current plans/expectations turn out to be problematic, then engage patients in discussing what could be done about this. We describe features of this sequence and how it can circumvent the risks of addressing problems with patients’ expectations and plans.

Conclusion
Our research breaks new ground, showing that by treating expectations, plans and decisions as potentially not actually problematic, practitioners can recognise and support patients’ preferences whilst preparing them for possible difficulties and inevitable uncertainties.

Practice Implications
Where professionals judge it appropriate to raise problems about patients’ preferences, plans and decisions, this sequence can manage the associated risks.
}}

Pino-Parry2019b

2019-05-24T09:08:05Z

MarcoPino:

{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marco Pino; Ruth Parry
|Title=Talking about death and dying: Findings and insights from five conversation analytic studies (Editorial)
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA
|Key=Pino-Parry2019b
|Year=2019
|Language=English
|Journal=Patient Education and Counseling
|Volume=102
|Pages=185-187
|DOI=10.1016/j.pec.2019.01.011
|Abstract=A special section in the present issue of Patient Education and
Counseling is dedicated to advancing knowledge on communication
about the end of life in healthcare settings. The
five studies in
the special section use the theoretical tenets and the analytic
techniques of conversation analysis (CA). In this editorial we briefly
overview prior CA research on communication about death and
dying, we illustrate how the studies in this special section advance
this research, and we consider the potential of CA studies to
contribute further to understandings of this area of social life.
}}

LboroAdvancedCA2019

2019-03-26T15:22:49Z

MarcoPino:

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Workshop in Advanced Conversation Analysis - Loughborough, 23-25 September 2019
|Short title=Advanced CA - Lboro
|Short summary=We will be running a workshop in Advanced Conversation Analysis on 23-25 September 2019 at Loughborough University. Enquiries and applications to: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk
|Announcement text=Workshop in Advanced Conversation Analysis

Loughborough University

23-25 September 2019

Conversation analysis (CA) is used in the scientific study of social interaction, ranging from mundane to institutional settings. CA is used to examine how people accomplish social activities through the use of talk and other semiotic resources (including the non-verbal). CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The 3-day workshop will provide an overview of advanced topics in CA research as well as key prospects and problems in CA methodology. The workshop aims to build on the skills that participants already have in CA methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This workshop will run from 1pm to 6pm on the first day and then 9am-6pm on the second day, and 9am-5pm on the third day.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover advanced aspects of CA and its applications to various areas of inquiry. Most of the workshop will be dedicated to practical sessions and hands-on analytic work. Participants will work in small groups on data provided by the facilitators. They will identify an original phenomenon and will share their findings in a short, informal group presentation towards the end of the workshop. The analytic work will be supported by the facilitators.

Facilitators: Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Ruth Parry, Marco Pino, Jessica Robles, Rein Sikveland, Elizabeth Stokoe.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers and faculty who have a good knowledge of CA and wish to consolidate their analytic skills. This includes established colleagues interested in exploring new specialties. The number of participants will be restricted to 20 (in order to maximise opportunities for participation). The fee for the three days will cover costs, including photocopies of training materials, refreshments and buffet lunches. For employed persons and PhD students with training budgets the charge is £250. For unwaged and PhD students without training budgets the charge is £195.

Do I need to have prior knowledge of conversation analysis?

Yes. This workshop is open to participants who have a good working knowledge of CA.

How do I apply?

Enquiries and applications to Marco Pino: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk

To help us prepare the Workshop and tailor it to participants’ interests: Please send a short note (no more than 100 words) saying what you would like us to cover. We have reserved some slots for skills session, which we would like to dedicate to participants’ preferred topics as much as possible.
|Year=2019
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2019/03/26
|To date=2019/09/25
|Address=Loughborough
}}

LboroAdvancedCA2019

2019-03-26T15:12:22Z

MarcoPino: Created page with "{{Announcement |Announcement Type=Workshop |Full title=Workshop in Advanced Conversation Analysis - Loughborough, 23-25 September 2019 |Short title=Advanced CA - Lboro |Short..."

{{Announcement
|Announcement Type=Workshop
|Full title=Workshop in Advanced Conversation Analysis - Loughborough, 23-25 September 2019
|Short title=Advanced CA - Lboro
|Short summary=We will be running a workshop in Advanced Conversation Analysis on 23-25 September 2019 at Loughborough University. Enquiries and applications to: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk
|Announcement text=Workshop in Advanced Conversation Analysis

Loughborough University

23-25 September 2019

Conversation analysis (CA) is used in the scientific study of social interaction, ranging from mundane to institutional settings. CA is used to examine how people accomplish social activities through the use of talk and other semiotic resources (including the non-verbal). CA studies range from basic work on the fundamentals of human interaction, to applied research aimed at contributing to service improvement.

What does this workshop cover?

The 3-day workshop will provide an overview of advanced topics in CA research as well as key prospects and problems in CA methodology. The workshop aims to build on the skills that participants already have in CA methods of analysis.

How is the workshop structured?

This workshop will run from 1pm to 6pm on the first day and then 9am-6pm on the second day, and 9am-5pm on the third day.

Short presentations by the facilitators will cover advanced aspects of CA and its applications to various areas of inquiry. Most of the workshop will be dedicated to practical sessions and hands-on analytic work. Participants will work in small groups on data provided by the facilitators. They will identify an original phenomenon and will share their findings in a short, informal group presentation towards the end of the workshop. The analytic work will be supported by the facilitators.

Facilitators: Saul Albert, Charles Antaki, Ruth Parry, Marco Pino, Jessica Robles, Elizabeth Stokoe.

Who is the workshop for?

The workshop is open to postgraduates, post-docs, researchers and faculty who have a good knowledge of CA and wish to consolidate their analytic skills. This includes established colleagues interested in exploring new specialties. The number of participants will be restricted to 20 (in order to maximise opportunities for participation). The fee for the three days will cover costs, including photocopies of training materials, refreshments and buffet lunches. For employed persons and PhD students with training budgets the charge is £250. For unwaged and PhD students without training budgets the charge is £195.

Do I need to have prior knowledge of conversation analysis?

Yes. This workshop is open to participants who have a good working knowledge of CA.

How do I apply?

Enquiries and applications to Marco Pino: m.pino@lboro.ac.uk

To help us prepare the Workshop and tailor it to participants’ interests: Please send a short note (no more than 100 words) saying what you would like us to cover. We have reserved some slots for skills session, which we would like to dedicate to participants’ preferred topics as much as possible.
|Year=2019
|Categories (tags)=Uncategorized;
|From date=2019/03/26
|To date=2019/09/25
|Address=Loughborough
}}