https://emcawiki.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=EdwardReynolds 2026-05-24T15:52:23Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.31.1 https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Reynolds-RendleShort2011&diff=9991 2016-11-04T16:54:11Z

<p>EdwardReynolds: Created page with &quot;{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Edward Reynolds; Joanna Rendle-Short |Title= Cues to deception in context: Response latency/gaps in denials and blame shifting |Tag(s)=C...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>{{BibEntry<br /> |BibType=ARTICLE<br /> |Author(s)=Edward Reynolds; Joanna Rendle-Short<br /> |Title= Cues to deception in context: Response latency/gaps in denials and blame shifting<br /> |Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; Deception; Latency; Pauses<br /> |Key=Reynolds-RendleShort2011<br /> |Publisher=John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd<br /> |Year=2011<br /> |Journal=British Journal of Social Psychology<br /> |Volume=50<br /> |Number=3<br /> |Pages=431-449<br /> |DOI=10.1348/014466610X520104<br /> |Abstract=Over 40 years of work on lying in psychology and communication has investigated numerous ‘cues to deception’– the subtle signals people show when they are lying. One of these cues to deception is ‘response latency’ or the gap that occurs between questions and the lying response. The current investigation uses the methodology of conversation analysis to re-consider the question of response latency in the context of lying. Drawing on data from two naturalistic sources, the television shows COPS and the Jeremy Kyle Show, this investigation analyses response latencies in order to show the regular organization of gaps between turns in both lies and non-lies. The current investigation demonstrates that in blame shifting turns which are lies, any gaps between turns result from a display of upcoming ‘trouble’, rather than being related to lying per se. The investigation highlights the need to analyse lies in the contexts in which they are told, taking prior and subsequent talk into account.<br /> }}</div>

EdwardReynolds https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=EvansReynolds2016&diff=9990 2016-11-04T16:45:44Z

<p>EdwardReynolds: Created page with &quot;{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Bryn Evans; Edward Reynolds; |Title=The Organization of Corrective Demonstrations Using Embodied Action in Sports Coaching Feedback |Ta...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>{{BibEntry<br /> |BibType=ARTICLE<br /> |Author(s)=Bryn Evans; Edward Reynolds; <br /> |Title=The Organization of Corrective Demonstrations Using Embodied Action in Sports Coaching Feedback<br /> |Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; Ethnomethodology; Correction sequences; Coaching process; <br /> |Key=EvansReynolds2016<br /> |Publisher=Wiley-Blackwell<br /> |Year=2016<br /> |DOI=10.1002/symb.255<br /> |Abstract=Focusing on video recordings of coaching sessions in the context of basketball and powerlifting, this paper investigates how the sports coaching process unfolds as situated interactions. The work of sports coaching is pervasively oriented toward teaching athletes the correct forms of motion and play. Correction then is one of the central constitutive practices of sports training sessions. In this paper, we draw on a collection of instances of correction demonstrations from powerlifting and basketball to describe their order. We demonstrate the three phases of these demonstrations: arranging bodies and gaze for visual access, presenting the error visually, and proposing a correction with an embodied demonstration. Findings underscore the management of shared visual access in multi-party correction demonstrations. In demonstrating how multiple bodies may be involved in embodied reenactments of a correctable problem, and demonstrating that it is seeing an error, more than reenactment per se, that is necessary for correction activities, the study extends existing understandings both of sports coaching processes and of instructional correction in embodied activities.<br /> }}</div>

EdwardReynolds