emcawiki - User contributions [en]

Helmer verstandlichkeit 2022

2025-05-08T20:30:56Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:55

{{BibEntry
|Key=helmer_verstandlichkeit_2022
|Key=helmer_verstandlichkeit_2022
|Title=Verständlichkeit und Partizipation in den Schlichtungsgesprächen zu Stuttgart 21
|Author(s)=Henrike Helmer; Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Political Interaction; Formulation
|Editor(s)=Heidrun Kämper; Albrecht Plewnia;
|Booktitle=Sprache in Politik und Gesellschaft. Perspektiven und Zugänge
|ISBN=978-3-11-077430-6
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Series=Jahrbuch / Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)
|Publisher=Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)
|Address=Berlin/Boston
|Year=2022
|Number=2021
|Pages=263 – 292
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-109075
|DOI=10.1515/9783110774306-016
|Note=ISSN: 1868-9124
|Abstract=Der vorliegende Beitrag untersucht aus interaktionslinguistischer Perspektive, wie Prinzipien deliberativer Demokratie in den Schlichtungsgesprächen zu Stuttgart 21 umgesetzt wurden. Wir konzentrieren uns dabei auf Interventionen, in denen der Schlichter Heiner Geißler die Wahrung von Verständlichkeit und Interessen der Bürger/-innen anmahnt, sowie Verletzungen der Wahrheitsnorm sanktioniert. Wir zeigen, wie Bürger/-innen sowie Normen und Werte rhetorisch als Ressource für das Einhalten von Verfahrensregeln genutzt werden, aber auch den Interessen des Schlichters selbst dienen. Dabei werden die Verfahrenswerte nicht immer einheitlich priorisiert. Die zugrunde liegende politische Diskussion wird zu Gunsten der Durchsetzung des Konstrukts ‚Faktenschlichtung' ausgeklammert.
}}

Scheidt2024

2025-05-08T20:30:55Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:54

{{BibEntry
|Key=scheidt_therapeutische_2024
|Key=scheidt_therapeutische_2024
|Title=Therapeutische Veränderungen in Traumerzählungen
|Author(s)=Carl Eduard Scheidt; Anja Stukenbrock; Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Psychotherapy
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Series=Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse und ihre Anwendungen
|Year=2024
|Journal=Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse und ihre Anwendungen
|Volume=78
|Number=11
|Pages=1032 – 1068
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-128963
|DOI=10.21706/ps-78-11-1032
|Note=Place: Stuttgart Publisher: Klett-Cotta
|Abstract=Es werden zwei Traumerzählungen zu unterschiedlichen Zeitpunkten einer tiefenpsychologischen Psychotherapie auf die sich in den Traumnarrativen darstellenden Veränderungen hin untersucht. Im Fokus stehen Veränderungen der Affektregulation und der Handlungsfähigkeit (Agency). Die Traumerzählungen liegen als Verbatim-Transkripte aus einer auf Video aufgezeichneten tiefenpsychologischen Psychotherapie vor und wurden methodisch mit Hilfe der Konversationsanalyse ausgewertet. Dabei zeigt sich, dass der manifeste Trauminhalt im Zuge eines »Nachträumens« im Fluss der Erzählung schrittweise narrativ rekonstruiert wird, wobei emotional hochbesetzte Traumbilder, Metakommentierungen und assoziative Verknüpfungen ineinanderfließen. Affektregulation und Handlungsfähigkeit auf der Ebene des Trauminhaltes wie in der Performanz der Traumerzählung erweisen sich als klinisch wichtige Indikatoren des therapeutischen Veränderungsprozesses.
}}

Deppermann2023a

2025-05-08T20:30:55Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:55

{{BibEntry
|Key=deppermann_meta-semantic_2024
|Key=deppermann_meta-semantic_2024
|Title=Meta-semantic practices in social interaction. Definitions and specifications provided in response to Was heißt X ('what does X mean')
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Semantics; Repair
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Year=2024
|Journal=Interactional Linguistics
|Volume=3
|Number=1-2
|Pages=13 – 39
|DOI=10.1075/il.23002.dep
|Abstract=In social interaction, different kinds of word-meaning can become problematic for participants. This study analyzes two meta-semantic practices, definitions and specifications, which are used in response to clarification requests in German implemented by the format Was heißt X ('What does X mean?'). In the data studied, definitions are used to convey generalizable lexical meanings of mostly technical terms. These terms are either unknown to requesters, or, in pedagogical contexts, requesters ask in order to check the addressee's knowledge. Specifications, in contrast, clarify aspects of local speaker meanings of ordinary expressions (e.g., reference, participants in an event, standards applied to scalar expressions). Both definitions and specifications are recipient-designed with respect to the (presumed) knowledge of the addressee and tailored to the topical and practical relevancies of the current interaction. Both practices attest to the flexibility and situatedness of speakers' semantic understandings and to the systematicity of using meta-semantic practices differentially for different kinds of semantic problems. Data are come from mundane and institutional interaction in German from the public corpus FOLK.
}}

Reineke forschungs- 2023

2025-05-08T20:30:55Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:55

{{BibEntry
|Key=reineke_forschungs-_2023
|Key=reineke_forschungs-_2023
|Title=Das Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus für Gesprochenes Deutsch (FOLK). Zum Nutzen eines großen annotierten Korpus gesprochener Sprache für interaktionslinguistische Fragestellungen
|Author(s)=Silke Reineke; Arnulf Deppermann; Thomas Schmidt;
|Tag(s)=Corpora; Methodology
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Christian Fandrych; Marc Kupietz; Thomas Schmidt;
|Booktitle=Korpora in der germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft. Mündlich, schriftlich, multimedial
|ISBN=978-3-11-108570-8
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Series=Jahrbuch / Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)
|Publisher=Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) [Zweitveröffentlichung]
|Address=Berlin/Boston
|Year=2023
|Number=2022
|Pages=71 – 102
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-115989
|DOI=10.1515/9783111085708-005
|Note=ISSN: 0537-7900
|Abstract=Der Beitrag illustriert die Nutzung des Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus Gesprochenes Deutsch (FOLK) für interaktionslinguistische Fragestellungen anhand einer exemplarischen Studie. Zunächst werden die Stratifikation (Datenkomposition) des Korpus, das zugrundeliegende Datenmodell und dessen Annotationsebenen sowie Typen von Untersuchungsinteressen vorgestellt, für die das Korpus nutzbar ist. Im Hauptteil wird Schritt für Schritt anhand einer Studie zur Verwendung des Formats was heißt X in der sozialen Interaktion gezeigt, wie mit FOLK relevante Daten gefunden und analysiert werden können. Abschließend weisen wir auf einige Vorsichtsmaßnahmen bei der Benutzung des Korpus hin.
}}

Schmidt2023a

2025-05-08T20:30:55Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:55

{{BibEntry
|Key=schmidt_editorial_2023
|Key=schmidt_editorial_2023
|Title=Editorial: Social interaction and the theater rehearsal
|Author(s)=Axel Schmidt; Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Series=Human Studies
|Year=2023
|Journal=Human Studies
|Volume=46
|Number=2
|Pages=191 – 197
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-119965
|DOI=10.1007/s10746-023-09678-2
|Note=Place: Berlin Publisher: Springer
|Abstract=Editorial on the research topic Social Interaction and the Theater Rehearsal
}}

Deppermann2023b

2025-05-08T20:30:55Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:55

{{BibEntry
|Key=deppermann_meta-semantic_2023
|Key=deppermann_meta-semantic_2023
|Title=Meta-semantic practices in social interaction. Definitions and specifications provided in response to Was heißt X ('what does X mean')
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Semantics; Repair
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Series=Interactional Linguistics
|Year=2023
|Journal=Interactional Linguistics
|Volume=3
|Number=1-2
|Pages=13 – 39
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-124322
|DOI=10.1075/il.23002.dep
|Note=Place: Amsterdam Publisher: Benjamins
|Abstract=In social interaction, different kinds of word-meaning can become problematic for participants. This study analyzes two meta-semantic practices, definitions and specifications, which are used in response to clarification requests in German implemented by the format Was heißt X ('What does X mean?'). In the data studied, definitions are used to convey generalizable lexical meanings of mostly technical terms. These terms are either unknown to requesters, or, in pedagogical contexts, requesters ask in order to check the addressee's knowledge. Specifications, in contrast, clarify aspects of local speaker meanings of ordinary expressions (e.g., reference, participants in an event, standards applied to scalar expressions). Both definitions and specifications are recipient-designed with respect to the (presumed) knowledge of the addressee and tailored to the topical and practical relevancies of the current interaction. Both practices attest to the flexibility and situatedness of speakers' semantic understandings and to the systematicity of using meta-semantic practices differentially for different kinds of semantic problems. Data are come from mundane and institutional interaction in German from the public corpus FOLK.
}}

Deppermann2023c

2025-05-08T20:30:55Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:55

{{BibEntry
|Key=deppermann_zur_2023-1
|Key=deppermann_zur_2023-1
|Title=Zur Verwendung von Metadaten in der interaktionsanalytischen Arbeit mit Korpora - am Beispiel einer Untersuchung anhand des Korpus FOLK
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Silke Reineke;
|Tag(s)=Corpora; Methodology
|Editor(s)=Michael Beißwenger; Eva Gredel; Lothar Lemnitzer; Roman Schneider;
|Booktitle=Korpusgestützte Sprachanalyse. Grundlagen, Anwendungen und Analysen
|ISBN=978-3-8233-8610-0
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Series=Studien zur deutschen Sprache
|Publisher=Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) [Zweitveröffentlichung]
|Address=Tübingen
|Year=2023
|Number=88
|Pages=245 – 259
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-121603
|DOI=10.24053/9783823396109
|Note=ISSN: 0949-409X
|Abstract=Metadaten zu Gesprächen und den beteiligten Sprecher/-innen enthalten Informationen, die für die Beschreibung, Erschließung und Analyse von Korpora wichtig sind. Bisher werden sie jedoch in der Konversationsanalyse und der Interaktionalen Linguistik so gut wie nicht genutzt. Dieser Beitrag zeigt exemplarisch, wie Metadaten des Gesprächskorpus „Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus Gesprochenes Deutsch (FOLK) im Rahmen einer interaktionslinguistischen Untersuchung verwendet werden können, um Regularitäten der Verwendung einer untersuchten Gesprächspraktik zu identifizieren und ihren Zusammenhang mit den Eigenschaften von Aktivitäten und Sprecherrollen zu klären. In allgemeinerer Perspektive diskutiert der Beitrag, wie und an welchen Stellen einer interaktionslinguistischen Untersuchung Metadaten von Nutzen sein können und wie ihr Stellenwert im Rahmen dieser Methodologie kritisch reflektiert werden muss.
}}

Schmidt2023b

2025-05-08T20:30:55Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:55

{{BibEntry
|Key=schmidt_showing_2023
|Key=schmidt_showing_2023
|Title=Showing and telling — How directors combine embodied demonstrations and verbal descriptions to instruct in theater rehearsals
|Author(s)=Axel Schmidt; Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Multimodal Interaction
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Series=Frontiers in communication
|Year=2023
|Journal=Frontiers in communication
|Volume=7
|Pages=955583
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-114658
|DOI=10.3389/fcomm.2022.955583
|Note=Place: Lausanne Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
|Abstract=In theater as a bodily-spatial art form, much emphasis is placed on the way actors perform movements in space as an important multimodal resource for creating meaning. In theater rehearsals, movements are created in series of directors' instructions and actors' implementations. Directors' instructions on how to conduct a movement often draw on embodied demonstrations in contrast to verbal descriptions. For instance, to instruct an actress to act like a school girl a director can use depictive (he demonstrates the expected behavior) instead of descriptive (can you act like a school girl) means. Drawing on a corpus of 400 h video recordings of rehearsal interactions in three German professional theater productions, from which we selected 265 cases, we examine ways to instruct movement-based actions in theater rehearsals. Using a multimodally extended ethnomethodological-conversation analytical approach, we focus on the multimodal details that constitute demonstrations as complex action types. For the present article, we have chosen nine instances, through which we aim to illuminate (1) The difference in using embodied demonstrations versus verbal descriptions to instruct; (2) typical ways directors combine verbal descriptions with embodied demonstrations in their instructions. First, we ask what constitutes a demonstration and what it achieves in comparison to verbal descriptions. Using a typical case, we illustrate four characteristics of demonstrations that all of the cases we studied share. Demonstrations (1) are embedded in instructional activities; (2) show and do not tell; (3) are responded to by emulating what was shown; (4) are rhetorically shaped to convey the instruction's focus. However, none of the 265 demonstrations we investigated were produced without verbal descriptions. In a second step we therefore ask in which typical ways verbal descriptions accompany embodied demonstrations when directors instruct actors how to play a scene. We distinguish four basic types. Verbal descriptions can be used (1) to build the demonstration itself; (2) to delineate a demonstration verbally within an instruction; (3) to indicate positive (what should be done) and negative (what should be avoided) versions of demonstrations; (4) as an independent means to describe the instruction's focus in addition to the demonstration. Our study contributes to research on how embodied resources are used to create meaning and how they combine with and depend on verbal resources.
}}

Deppermann2024c

2025-05-08T20:30:54Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:54

{{BibEntry
|Key=deppermann_self-translations_2024
|Key=deppermann_self-translations_2024
|Title=Self-translations in multilingual workplace interaction
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Ibrahim Cindark; Lari Kotilainen; Salla Kurhila; Inkeri Lehtimaja;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Lingustics; Workplace interaction
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Series=Intercultural Pragmatics
|Year=2024
|Journal=Intercultural Pragmatics
|Volume=21
|Number=4
|Pages=507 – 540
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-127918
|DOI=10.1515/ip-2024-4002
|Note=Place: Berlin Publisher: de Gruyter
|Abstract=In multi-lingual workplace interaction involving L2-speakers with different levels of proficiency, L1-speakers can be seen to use self-translation of their own prior contributions as a repair-practice to restore intersubjectivity. This paper shows that self-translations are produced in three environments: (a) in response to repair-initiation by recipients, (b) in response to inadequate or missing responses, (c) after disaffiliative responses in order to elicit a more favorable uptake. Self-translations therefore are not only used to deal with linguistic understanding problems, but can also use linguistic diversity as a resource for dealing with lack of affiliation and alignment. Self-translations are produced by a switch to the addressee's L1 or to a lingua franca. They are only partial, being restricted to a translation of the core semantic content of the turn to be translated, thus relying heavily on a shared understanding of the pragmatic context and being designed so as to support interactional progression. Data come from video-taped meetings in Finland involving Finnish and Russian L1-speakers and various kinds of professional trainings in Germany involving instructors with German as L1 and refugees with various linguistic backgrounds.
}}

Deppermann2024a

2025-05-08T20:30:54Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:53

{{BibEntry
|Key=deppermann_request_2024
|Key=deppermann_request_2024
|Title=Request for confirmation sequences in German
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Alexandra Gubina; Katharina König; Martin Pfeiffer;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Eequests; Questions
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Year=2024
|Month=aug
|Journal=Open Linguistics
|Volume=10
|Number=1
|Pages=1–23
|URL=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opli-2024-0008/html
|DOI=10.1515/opli-2024-0008
|Abstract=Abstract In request for confirmation (RfC) sequences, interlocutors negotiate their social positions regarding access and rights to knowledge. The article presents an overview of a quantitative analysis of 200 RfCs and their responses in German conversations to highlight the relevant linguistic resources speakers of the language deployed to position themselves vis-à-vis a confirmable proposition. In German RfCs, modal particles and tags play an important role in expressing the requester’s epistemic stance; explicit inference marking is used less frequently. Responses usually include response tokens (among others doch as a token specialized for disconfirming negatively formatted RfCs) and an expansion. The article shows that such expansions do important work to tailor the response to the situated informational needs of the requester in a cooperative way beyond the constraints of type-conformity.
}}

Perakyla2025

2025-05-08T20:30:54Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:54

{{BibEntry
|Key=perakyla_when_2024
|Key=perakyla_when_2024
|Title=When and how patients' self-claims are challenged in psychotherapy
|Author(s)=Anssi Peräkylä; Liisa Voutilainen; Mariel Wuolio; Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Psychotherapy
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Year=2024
|Month=sep
|Journal=Language in Society
|Pages=1–27
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0047404524000435/type/journal_article
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404524000435
|Abstract=Abstract The article describes the practices through which patients’ self-presentations are challenged in psychotherapy. Based on the analysis of thirty-eight instances from psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis, analyzed with methods of conversation analysis, narrative analysis, and coding, this article reports on how therapists challenge patients’ self-conceptualizations in response to patients’ self-presentations. Challenges mostly follow patients’ descriptive, narrative, or evaluative accounts that include a strong claim about their self. Challenges to the self pertain to core issues of the therapeutic projects. They are mostly built in ways that show its sensitivity to probable rejection by the patient. Overwhelmingly, the challenge is accounted for by reference to shared knowledge built in the participants’ shared interactional history. Arguably, psychotherapy is a particular setting where the organization of face-work is modified, as occasional challenging of the co-interactant's self-presentation is part of the institutional task of the professional participant. Data are in Finnish and German. (Self, psychotherapy, Goffman, conversation analysis)*
}}

Gubina2025b

2025-05-08T20:30:54Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:54

{{BibEntry
|Key=gubina_selbstadressierte_2025
|Key=gubina_selbstadressierte_2025
|Title=Selbstadressierte Fragen im gesprochenen Deutsch
|Author(s)=Alexandra Gubina; Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Lingustics; Questions
|Editor(s)=Nadine Proske; Thilo Weber; Monika Dannerer; Arnulf Deppermann;
|Booktitle=Gesprochenes Deutsch. Struktur, Variation, Interaktion
|ISBN=978-3-11-162357-3
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Series=Jahrbuch / Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)
|Publisher=Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) [Zweitveröffentlichung]
|Address=Berlin/Boston
|Year=2025
|Number=2024
|Pages=319 – 345
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-130267
|DOI=10.1515/9783111623825
|Note=ISSN: 0537-7900
|Abstract=Selbstadressierte Fragen wurden bislang vor allem im Kontext von Wortsuchen untersucht. Unsere Studie behandelt weitere Verwendungen von selbstadressierten Fragen im gesprochenen Deutsch auf Grundlage des Korpus FOLK. Wir analysieren Fragen nach Informationen, nach Objekten sowie nach (der Reaktualisierung von) beabsichtigten Handlungen und Themen. Wir zeigen, dass selbstadressierte Fragen durch zahlreiche optionale Merkmale angezeigt werden, aber dennoch manchmal hinsichtlich ihrer Adressierung ambig bleiben können. Sie dienen der Selbstorganisation der Sprecher:innen und der intersubjektiv nachvollziehbaren Interaktionssteuerung, indem sie projiziertes Handeln transparent machen und kooperative Partizipation ermöglichen.
}}

Deppermann2025

2025-05-08T20:30:54Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:54

{{BibEntry
|Key=deppermann_lean_2025
|Key=deppermann_lean_2025
|Title=Lean syntax: how argument structure is adapted to its interactive, material, and temporal ecology
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics
|Editor(s)=Nina-Kristin Meister; Markus Steinbach;
|Booktitle=Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung
|ISBN=978-3-96769-427-7
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Series=Linguistische Berichte - Sonderhefte
|Publisher=Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) [Zweitveröffentlichung]
|Address=Hamburg
|Year=2025
|Number=35
|Pages=7 – 46
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-129961
|Note=ISSN: 0935-9249
|Abstract=It has often been argued that argument structure in spoken discourse is less complex than in written discourse. This paper argues that lean argument structure, in particular, argument omission, gives evidence of how the production and understanding of linguistic structures is adapted to the interactive, material, and temporal ecology of talk in interaction. It is shown how lean argument structure builds on participants' ongoing bodily conduct, joint perceptual salience, joint attention, and their orientation to expectable next actions within a joint project. The phenomena discussed in this paper are verb derived discourse markers and tags, analepsis in responsive actions, and ellipsis in first actions, such as requests and instructions. The study draws from transcripts and audio and video recordings of naturally occurring interaction in German from the Research and Teaching Corpus of Spoken German (FOLK).
}}

Deppermann2024b

2025-05-08T20:30:54Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:54

{{BibEntry
|Key=deppermann_what_2024
|Key=deppermann_what_2024
|Title=What do you understand by X? Semantics in Interactional Linguistics
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Semantics; Repair
|Editor(s)=Margret Selting; Dagmar Barth-Weingarten;
|Booktitle=New perspectives in interactional linguistic research
|ISBN=978-90-272-4691-2
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Series=Studies in language and social interaction
|Publisher=Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2024
|Number=36
|Pages=103 – 131
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-127898
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.36.04dep
|Note=ISSN: 1879-3983
|Abstract=This chapter discusses major developments in the field of Interactional Semantics. After locating Interactional Semantics within the study of semantics and introducing major contributions to the field, two approaches for studying semantics in interaction are exemplified: The study of meta-semantic practices (in particular, defining) is concerned with actions by which participants clarify local meanings of expressions they are using; the study of interactional histories is concerned with how the accumulation of common ground over a series of interactions affects both lexical choices and the interpretation of the expressions used. The studies show how indexicality, action-orientation, and recipient-design are basic properties of semantic practice in social interaction.
}}

Deppermann2023

2025-05-08T20:30:54Z

77.187.17.45: BibTeX auto import 2025-05-08 02:30:54

{{BibEntry
|Key=deppermann_meaning_2024
|Key=deppermann_meaning_2024
|Title=Meaning in interaction
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Elwys De Stefani;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Semantics
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Series=Interactional Linguistics
|Year=2024
|Journal=Interactional Linguistics
|Pages=1 – 12
|URL=https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-125762
|DOI=10.1075/il.24004.dep
|Note=Place: Amsterdam Publisher: Benjamins
|Abstract=This editorial to the Special Issue on Meaning in Interaction introduces to the approach of Interactional Semantics, which has been developed over the last years within the framework of Interactional Linguistics. It discusses how meaning is understood and approached in this framework and lays out that Interactional Semantics is interested in how participants clarify and negotiate the meanings of the expressions that they are using in social interaction. Commonalities and differences of this approach with other approaches to meaning are flagged, and the intellectual origins and precursors of Interactional Semantics are introduced. The contributions to the Special Issue are located in the larger field of research.
}}