https://emcawiki.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=213.49.143.5 2026-05-25T01:34:37Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.31.1 https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=DeLand2021&diff=27450 2021-04-21T09:23:13Z

<p>213.49.143.5: BibTeX auto import 2021-04-21 09:23:12</p> <hr /> <div>{{BibEntry<br /> |Key=DeLand2021<br /> |Key=DeLand2021<br /> |Title=Men and Their Moments: Character-Driven Ethnography and Interaction Analysis in a Park Basketball Rule Dispute<br /> |Author(s)=Michael F. DeLand;<br /> |Tag(s)=EMCA; In press; biography; conversation analysis; ethnography; microsociology; public space; social interaction<br /> |BibType=ARTICLE<br /> |Year=2021<br /> |Journal=Social Psychology Quarterly<br /> |Volume=0<br /> |Number=0<br /> |Pages=0<br /> |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/01902725211004894<br /> |DOI=https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725211004894<br /> |Abstract=Both conversation-analytic and ethnographic studies of interaction tend to isolate situated conduct from the full biographical context that is meaningful to actors. This article argues that there are good analytic reasons to recover some of that biographical context by incorporating character-driven ethnographic representation within interactionist research. I make this case in reference to a rule dispute captured on video during an ethnography of a public park basketball game. Through a biographically contextualized analysis of players’ situated conduct, I show how character representation allows unspoken threads of actors’ lives to become analytic resources. Incorporating biographical context also opens a methodological path for interactionists to leverage the close-up study of situated encounters for empirical claims about broader forms of social organization. In this case, I argue that character-driven representation allows for an analysis that identifies rule disputes as an interactional mechanism of socially integrative park use.<br /> }}</div>

213.49.143.5 https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=VanBraak2021&diff=27449 2021-04-21T09:16:05Z

<p>213.49.143.5: BibTeX auto import 2021-04-21 09:16:05</p> <hr /> <div>{{BibEntry<br /> |Key=VanBraak2021<br /> |Key=VanBraak2021<br /> |Title=Shall We All Unmute? A Conversation Analysis of Participation in Online Reflection Sessions for General Practitioners in Training<br /> |Author(s)=Marije van Braak; Mike Huiskes; Sven Schaepkens; Mario Veen; <br /> |Tag(s)=EMCA; online education; participation; conversation analysis; collaborative reflection <br /> |BibType=ARTICLE<br /> |Year=2021<br /> |Journal=Languages<br /> |Volume=6<br /> |Number=2<br /> |URL=https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/6/2/72<br /> |DOI=10.3390/languages6020072<br /> |Abstract=The COVID-19 pandemic has induced many changes to education in many contexts. In this study, we describe how general practitioners in training (residents) accomplish participation in collaborative reflection sessions conducted on Zoom. In this online setting, taking part in interactions is understood to be crucial to the creation of educational value. To study forms of participation used on Zoom, we recorded three group reflection sessions and examined them with Conversation Analysis. We focused on how participation is shaped by and is contingent upon the affordances of the online environment. Our analyses show that participants explicitly orient to the interactional accomplishment of participation in frameworks that change in the various phases of case discussion. Participants establish new procedures to deal with both familiar and sometimes new problems of participation introduced by the online environment. We describe these procedures in detail to contribute to the understanding of the accomplishment of participation through situated practices such as embodied talk-in-interaction. The findings can serve training purposes in online education across both medical and non-medical curricula.<br /> }}</div>

213.49.143.5