https://emcawiki.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=2.122.100.255emcawiki - User contributions [en]2026-05-25T06:25:05ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.31.1https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Zulkffli2019&diff=17032Zulkffli20192019-05-10T21:13:17Z<p>2.122.100.255: BibTeX auto import 2019-05-10 09:13:16</p>
<hr />
<div>{{BibEntry<br />
|Key=Zulkffli2019<br />
|Key=Zulkffli2019<br />
|Title=Discursive strategies employed by homosexual Malaysian Muslim men in talking about homosexuality in Islam<br />
|Author(s)=Mohd Asyraf Zulkffli; Radzuwan Ab Rashid; <br />
|Tag(s)=Discursive Action Model; Discursive Psychology; discursive strategies; homosexuality; Muslim; Malaysia; sexual minority; interviews; identity; <br />
|BibType=ARTICLE<br />
|Year=2019<br />
|Journal=Discourse & Society<br />
|Volume=30<br />
|Number=3<br />
|Pages=307-320<br />
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519828032<br />
|DOI=10.1177/0957926519828032<br />
|Abstract=This research looks into how homosexual Muslim men in Malaysia convey their experiences regarding their sexual and romantic lifestyle in relation to their Islamic faith. For this research, four respondents who identify themselves as homosexual and Muslim were subjected to in-depth, semi-structured interview to gauge their experiences, thoughts and beliefs in regard to their sexual and religious experiences. Discursive Psychology (DP), more specifically, the Discursive Action Model (DAM) as proposed by Edwards and Potter is used as analytical tool to explicate the data of this research. The analysis reveals several recurring themes which appear throughout the participants’ discourses, which are (1) Disrupted Construction of Cohesive Identity, (2) Indomitable Nature of Same-sex Desire and (3) Downplaying the Severity of Same-sex Relation in Islam. The findings of this research provide novel insights into the way the homosexual Muslim’s phenomenon is perceived and thus, complicates the notion of homosexuality in Islam.<br />
}}</div>2.122.100.255https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Galanova2019&diff=17031Galanova20192019-05-10T21:07:47Z<p>2.122.100.255: BibTeX auto import 2019-05-10 09:07:46</p>
<hr />
<div>{{BibEntry<br />
|Key=Galanova2019<br />
|Key=Galanova2019<br />
|Title=The ambivalence of detail – documenting wiretapped phone conversations by the State Security Service of the former German Democratic Republic<br />
|Author(s)=Olga Galanova; <br />
|Tag(s)=ethnomethodology; record-keeping; wiretapped phone conversations; surveillance; German; subject-object relations; objectifying practices; <br />
|BibType=ARTICLE<br />
|Year=2019<br />
|Journal=Discourse & Society<br />
|Volume=30<br />
|Number=3<br />
|Pages=248-263<br />
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519828028<br />
|DOI=10.1177/0957926519828028<br />
|Abstract=The German Democratic Republic (GDR) State Security Service (Stasi) had to archive vast amounts of data about the everyday lives of GDR citizens. Simplifications and reductions are common features of record-keeping in every institution and there was considerable variation in how detailed the Stasi records of wiretapped phone conversations were. The special focus of this study is the detail that shapes phone records into powerful objects of knowledge among other documentary genres of the Stasi archive. The article describes, in the context of suspicion, how decisions were made about the level of detail in the records given the information overflow, and which communicative and institutional tasks were solved using the different levels of detail in the textualization. Records fulfilled the function of (subjective) information selection for the creation of such categories as ‘strange’, ‘dangerous’, ‘suspicious’ and ‘guilty’. Objectifying practices were necessary to legitimize the records as objective proof of suspicion. The ‘subjective–objective’ relationship turns from a dichotomy to a co-presence within one record and serves to legitimize the record as evidence.<br />
}}</div>2.122.100.255