emcawiki - User contributions [en]

Keevallik2015

2015-03-23T11:28:46Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:46

{{BibEntry
|Key=Keevallik2015
|Key=Keevallik2015
|Title=Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance
|Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik;
|Tag(s)=EMCA
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=309–336
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.10kee
}}

Maschler2015

2015-03-23T11:28:45Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:45

{{BibEntry
|Key=Maschler2015
|Key=Maschler2015
|Title=Word Order in Time Emergent Hebrew (NS)V/VNS Syntax
|Author(s)=Yael Maschler;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=201–236
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.07mas
|Abstract=This study explores the temporal dynamics of subject-predicate word order in the verbal clauses of spoken narrative Hebrew discourse. Contrary to previous claims (Glinert 1989), word order is shown to be rather fixed, with only 57 tokens of the VNs construction in a 6.5 hour corpus. They are employed to introduce a protagonist/referent, to index a major shift in narrative flow, or to end a complication episode/narrative (Labov 1972) by resolving it and/or formulating its climax. Prosodic patterns are shown to strongly correlate with syntactic patterns. Constraints of temporal dynamics at clause-level syntax (syntactic projections, Auer 2005) along with the motivation to enhance audience involvement (Tannen 1989), result in the emergence of Hebrew as an (Ns)V/VNs Alternating language (Hopper 1987b).
}}

Gunthner2015

2015-03-23T11:28:45Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:45

{{BibEntry
|Key=Gunthner2015
|Key=Gunthner2015
|Title=A temporally oriented perspective on connectors in interactions und zwar ('namely/in fact')-constructions in everyday German” conversations
|Author(s)=Susanne Günthner;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; projection; temporality
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=237–264
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.08gun
|Abstract=This paper examines und zwar-(‘namely/in fact’)-constructions in terms of their real-time processing in interaction. In using und zwar, speakers orient backwards by linking their current utterance to prior ones. At the same time, und zwar functions as a projecting strategy for anticipating upcoming activities. Thus, in everyday interactions, speakers use und zwar as a resource in tying following segments back to past (self or other performed) activities, and at the same time, indicating the kind of relationship (i.e. specification, explanation or illustration) between prior and following activity. Due to their joining potential in referring back to prior talk as well as projecting a following specification, und zwar-constructions are a recognizable pattern used specifically for the management of temporality in discourse.
}}

PekarekDoehler2015

2015-03-23T11:28:44Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:44

{{BibEntry
|Key=PekarekDoehler2015
|Key=PekarekDoehler2015
|Title=Grammar, projection and turn-organization il y a NP ‘there is NP’ as project construction in French talk-in-interaction
|Author(s)=Simona Pekarek Doehler;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; emergent grammar; mulimodality; projection
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=173–200
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.06pek
|Abstract=This paper contributes to the debate over the temporal and emergent nature of grammar. Focusing on projection as a basis for clause-combining and the organization of actions, the paper explores speakers’ use of the French construction il y a NP ‘there is NP’, commonly considered to be part of a presentational cleft. The analysis of audio and video recorded social interactions provides evidence for the routinization of the il y a NP piece as a projector construction and documents its involvement in the management of multi-unit turns, turn-taking and sequence organization. Multimodal analysis shows how the projection emanating from the grammatical construction is prolonged by means of gesture. Results are discussed in the light of the emergent character of grammar.
}}

Deppermann2015c

2015-03-23T11:28:44Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:44

{{BibEntry
|Key=Deppermann2015c
|Key=Deppermann2015c
|Title=Temporality in Interaction
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; emergent grammar; temporality
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|ISBN=978 90 272 2637 2
|BibType=BOOK
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Volume=27
|URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027268990
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27
|Abstract=Time is a constitutive element of everyday interaction: all verbal interaction is produced and interpreted in time. However, it is only recently that research in linguistics has started to take the temporality of linguistic production and reception in interaction into account by studying the real-time and on-line dimension of spoken language. This volume is the first systematic collection of studies exploring temporality in interaction and its theoretical foundations. It brings together researchers focusing on how temporality impinges on the production and interpretation of linguistic structures in interaction and how linguistic resources are designed to deal with the exigencies and potentials of temporality in interaction. The volume provides new insights into the temporal design of a range of heretofore unexplored linguistic phenomena from various languages as well as into the temporal aspects of linguistic structures in embodied interaction.
}}

Deppermann2015b

2015-03-23T11:28:43Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:43

{{BibEntry
|Key=Deppermann2015b
|Key=Deppermann2015b
|Title=Retrospection and Understanding in Interaction
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann;
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; retrospection; temporality
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=57–94
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.02dep
|Abstract=This paper shows how understanding in interaction is informed by temporality, and in particular, by the workings of retrospection. Understanding is a temporally extended, sequentially organized process. Temporality, namely, the sequential relationship of turn positions, equips participants with default mechanisms to display understandings and to expect such displays. These mechanisms require local management of turn-taking to be in order, i.e., the possibility and the expectation to respond locally and reciprocally to prior turns at talk. Sequential positions of turns in interaction provide an infrastructure for displaying understanding and accomplishing intersubjectivity. Linguistic practices specialized in displaying particular kinds of (not) understanding are adapted to the individual sequential positions with respect to an action-to-be-understood.
}}

Imo2015

2015-03-23T11:28:43Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:43

{{BibEntry
|Key=Imo2015
|Key=Imo2015
|Title=Temporality and syntactic structure utterance-final intensifiers in spoken German
|Author(s)=Wolfgang Imo;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=147–172
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.05imo
|Abstract=In German syntax, the so-called right verb brace, which is occupied either by the non-finite parts of the verb or a predicative, signals a strong syntactic boundary of a clause after which – at least from a normative perspective – only few further elements are allowed to occur. Nevertheless, in spoken German one can find many instances where words or phrases are uttered after the right verb brace which – canonically speaking – should have been placed before it. This article analyzes one class of such ‘misplaced’ items, namely post-positioned intensifiers, from a temporal and interactional perspective on language.
}}

Ford2015

2015-03-23T11:28:42Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:42

{{BibEntry
|Key=Ford2015
|Key=Ford2015
|Title=Ephemeral Grammar At the far end of emergence
|Author(s)=Cecilia E. Ford; Barbara A. Fox;
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Emergent Grammar; Interactional Linguistics; sedimentation; temporality
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=95–120
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.03for
|Abstract=Drawing on the theoretical and methodological approach of Conversation Analysis (CA) and aiming to contribute to research on Emergent Grammar (e.g., Hopper 1987, 2011; Bybee and Hopper 2001) and sequentially specific grammar (Schegloff 1996; Fox 1994; Thompson et al. to appear), this chapter takes up temporality in talk-in-interaction by addressing a fundamental assumption in the theory of emergent grammar: the temporal directionality of emergence as moving toward sedimentation. The close analysis of an extended turn at talk compels us to consider provisional and emergent form as possible without movement toward sedimentation beyond the local context.
}}

Hopper2015

2015-03-23T11:28:42Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:42

{{BibEntry
|Key=Hopper2015
|Key=Hopper2015
|Title=Temporality and the Emergence of a Construction A Discourse Approach to Sluicing
|Author(s)=Paul J. Hopper;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; sluice; temporality; turn construction
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=123–146
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.04hop
|Abstract=A sluice (Ross 1969) is a wh-word that, in the standard syntactic view, refers to ellipted material in an antecedent clause. In the present study, based on conversational data, I view sluices from a temporal and interactional perspective in which grammatical constructions are seen as emergent in time rather than as fixed stable entities. I analyze the different timings of sluices in terms of their projective, retractive, preemptive and other functions. Pre-sluices are forward-oriented and work to block potential questions that might distract from a current or upcoming theme. Post-sluices are “retractions” (cf. Auer 2009) that close off a completed turn or a sequence of turns.
}}

Auer2015

2015-03-23T11:28:41Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:41

{{BibEntry
|Key=Auer2015
|Key=Auer2015
|Title=The temporality of language in interaction projection and latency
|Author(s)=Peter Auer;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; latency; projection
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=27–56
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.01aue
|Abstract=This paper focuses on two basic principles in the dialogical emergence of self-contained linguistic units (‘sentences’) in interaction: projection and latency. Both are elementary for the synchronization of participants’ minds in what I call the online emergence of syntax. Projection enables speakers and recipients to predict – on the basis of what has been said so far – structural slots in the emergent syntactic gestalt. Latency, on the other hand, relates a new utterance to the structure of the preceding one(s). It links the structure of an emergent syntactic gestalt to that of previous, already complete syntactic gestalts. Projection and latency can easily be observed in mundane conversational phenomena that happen time and again in everyday interaction.
}}

Deppermann2015a

2015-03-23T11:28:40Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:40

{{BibEntry
|Key=Deppermann2015a
|Key=Deppermann2015a
|Title=Temporality in interaction
|Author(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne G\unthner;
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; retrospection; sequential organization; sequentiality; temporality
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Pages=1–24
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.001int
|Abstract=The authors establish a phenomenological perspective on the temporal constitution of experience and action. Retrospection and projection (i.e. backward as well as forward orientation of everyday action), sequentiality and the sequential organization of activities as well as simultaneity (i.e. participants' simultaneous coordination) are introduced as key concepts of a temporalized approach to interaction. These concepts are used to capture that every action is produced as an inter-linked step in the succession of adjacent actions, being sensitive to the precise moment where it is produced. The adoption of a holistic, multimodal and praxeological perspective additionally shows that action in interaction is organized according to several temporal orders simultaneously in operation. Each multimodal resource used in interaction has its own temporal properties.
}}

Mondada2015a

2015-03-23T11:28:39Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:38

{{BibEntry
|Key=Mondada2015a
|Key=Mondada2015a
|Title=Multimodal completions
|Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada;
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; completion; mulimodality
|Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner;
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction
|ISBN=978 90 272 2637 2
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia
|Year=2015
|Volume=27
|Pages=267–308
|URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027268990
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27
|Abstract=This chapter deals with the temporal deployment of multiple multimodal resources mobilized by the participants in social interaction, focussing on the emergent temporality of turns and actions. More precisely, it analyzes the participants mobilization of multimodal resources for achieving unit completions, showing how embodied completion is visibly achieved in an emergent way, how it is possibly revised by speakers and their co-participants as interaction unfolds in time, how embodied resources are integrated and embedded with language in a timely fashion. By so doing, the chapter reveals how participants use and configure complex multiÂmodal Gestalts in the orderly temporal arrangement of their turns, sequences and actions. Tt shows how these multimodal Gestalts involve not only talk and gesture, but also the entire body and its movements.
}}

Svennevig2008

2015-03-03T13:29:58Z

137.194.2.20: BibTeX auto import 2015-03-03 02:29:57

{{BibEntry
|Key=Svennevig2008
|Key=Svennevig2008
|Title=Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair
|Author(s)=Jan Svennevig;
|Tag(s)=EMCA; hearing; open class repair initiators; other-initiated repair; preference; trouble source; understanding
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Year=2008
|Month=feb
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
|Volume=40
|Number=2
|Pages=333–348
|URL=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378216607002111
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.007
}}